pickarooney wrote: They were dead right to film it. Who knows what kind of crackpot allegations she could have made against them and what they'd have to go through to clear their name.
pilly wrote: » Tbf, they only recorded one side of it. We actually don't know what they were doing.
Mountainsandh wrote: » As far as I can make out the police were called, so really after that, her mental health shouldn't be any concern of these people waiting in queue. Your man was right to keep filming as things were starting to get physical towards the end, and this person, mental illness or not, was likely to give a very twisted version of events to the police, had it evolved into physical assault. It's not really dragging the a$s out of the situation. And publishing it on Youtube ? Yeah, maybe not the nicest thing to do, but something that is now part of our lives. The good like the bad get posted. It may prevent some bad.
J Mysterio wrote: Who cares what they were doing? Her behaviour was totally unnaceptable. I'm not a fan of PDA myself, but get over it ffs. Get your food and piss off home.
LexieOnRale wrote: » Can I use the fact I may be mentally ill as an excuse for my offensive rant?
pilly wrote: » No I agree, she totally over reacted. I just hate this passive aggressive attitude of taping people.
J Mysterio wrote: As has been pointed out, the woman was clearly unhinged - who knew what she was capable of? The guy obviously kept the camera rolling to protect himself once it escalated.
pilly wrote: » In fact had she assaulted one of the couple the restaurant would have been to blame for not stopping the situation. I don't think it's a case of them not knowing what to do. I think it's a case of them enjoying it.
__Alex__ wrote: » Don't you feel silly thanking a post where the poster said they hadn't even watch the video but despite that fact decided the person in the video was talking more sense than something, something Hillary something. I don't think politics is particularly relevent to yer wan in the video either way and shouldn't have been brought up IMO but thanking such a stupid post because it makes a dig at people who supported Hillary Clinton. Really? That's kinda sad.
Yourself isit wrote: » Santa Monica - LA county. 22% votes for trump.
eviltwin wrote: » ...when did recording stuff like this become the acceptable reaction.
pilly wrote: » And to post on Youtube? He actually says "can't wait to put this on Youtube". Let's not pretend it was to protect himself. Plenty of witnesses to do that.
pickarooney wrote: » They were dead right to film it. Who knows what kind of crackpot allegations she could have made against them and what they'd have to go through to clear their name.
Outlaw Pete wrote: Jesus titty Christ... no I don't "feel silly" for thanking the post. I thanked it because the user held their hands up and admitted what they did and did so in a funny and self depreciating way (I thought). Don't you feel silly whining about users thanking posts over and over?
learn_more wrote: » This video has been removed for violating YouTube's policy on harassment and bullying. For anyone that missed it the video depicts a situation in a late night takeaway restaurant in the US where an attractive slim young couple obviously in love while waiting to order grub get harassed by another female customer, an unkempt dowdy looking nose-ringed pony-tailed Donald Trump supporter type, who starts mouthing off in an extreme fashion to the lovely couple in protest at their public display of affection for each other. The thing says goes on to claim that she is being sexually harassed by the couple for no other reason than she herself is in eyesight of the couple and that the slim woman's actions is tantamount to behaving like a prostitute, indeed that she is one, and proceeds to call the police to have the lovely couple arrested. The couple remain surprisingly calm throughout the incident where it ends by the woman eventually departing the venue. There appears to be disagreement as to whether the Trump supporter has some mental issues that caused her outburst or if she's just a sad individual with a chip on her shoulder. My assessment would be the latter and the video serves as a damming indictment of a large proportion of the Trump supporting US of A.
Galwayguy35 wrote: How do you know she was a Trump supporter, was she wearing a baseball cap with Trumps name on it?
Galwayguy35 wrote: » Seeing as the video is gone I can't see for myself.
pilly wrote: » Totally agree. Who even reads the people that thanked a post?
Galwayguy35 wrote: » How do you know she was a Trump supporter, was she wearing a baseball cap with Trumps name on it? Seeing as the video is gone I can't see for myself.
__Alex__ wrote: I do. I glean a lot from doing so. Different strokes.
pilly wrote: » I just hate this passive aggressive attitude of taping people.
......... wrote: » The video was pretty shameful to be honest, it was all about a gang of people just baiting, harassing, and winding up someone who clearly has a lot of mental health issues, and then making fun and money out of them with the video.
Widdershins wrote: » Would a normal sane as****e have continued with all the witnesses and a phone recording going on. I doubt it.
yoke wrote: » Don't know why people keep bringing up possible mental health issues as if it condones her behaviour. Half the violent offenders in prison have the same sort of "mental health issues", should they all not have to face the consequences of their actions either?
Mountainsandh wrote: » Some would stop, but the less clever ones would continue. It doesn't mean that they have mental health issues. I know lots like that. Kinda like someone who would get close to death after an accident making doughnuts and does them again as soon as they get back behind the wheel.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXz9Fe-GjGQ