elastico wrote: » livedadream wrote: » #fakenews dude you have no idea what you are on about. it comes across like you have nothing positive to say about anything to do with the recovery and investigation and have no mind for the people down there doing the work. youre talking about the families but have no idea whats going on. take it somewhere else will ya? youre either trolling or just looking for a fight.. or are too much of an 'expert' in your field that you dont work for the two biggest sea agencys in the country... Weren't you telling us earlier the cabin may still be watertight? Somehow they got a body out without making a big hole? I think he knows a lot more than you. People are entitled to a different point of view on this. It seems anybody who doesn't compliment all aspects of the operation gets lambasted.
livedadream wrote: » #fakenews dude you have no idea what you are on about. it comes across like you have nothing positive to say about anything to do with the recovery and investigation and have no mind for the people down there doing the work. youre talking about the families but have no idea whats going on. take it somewhere else will ya? youre either trolling or just looking for a fight.. or are too much of an 'expert' in your field that you dont work for the two biggest sea agencys in the country...
livedadream wrote: » if you read the post i said no one but the 9 lads down there .
Stheno wrote: » livedadream wrote: » if you read the post i said no one but the 9 lads down there . The press reported last week that there were five teams of ten divers?http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/hopes-weather-will-allow-recovery-of-rescue-116-crew-member-35564908.html Where are you getting this nine lads number from?
livedadream wrote: » no i didnt, again i questioned the guys knowledge because theres no way he could know what condition its in. I actually know what condition its in. but because im not a tool, or want a pissing contest im keeping my gob shut. edit: didnt see the mod warning so edited to remove comments.
elastico wrote: » livedadream wrote: » no i didnt, again i questioned the guys knowledge because theres no way he could know what condition its in. I actually know what condition its in. but because im not a tool, or want a pissing contest im keeping my gob shut. edit: didnt see the mod warning so edited to remove comments. How do you know what condition it's in?
livedadream wrote: » not are all from the navy. i can only speak about what i know and thats the navy. the navy are on the wreckage, the garda divers and under water unit are searching the wider area around the wreckage, if you read the article you linked to you'd have read that. but im also not relaying on the newspapers for my updates. (i also dont relay on the indo in general to be fair)
livedadream wrote: » try reading the thread, or even if that's too difficult, reading just my posts.
elastico wrote: » Any chance you can answer the question, have you seen it to know what condition it's in or not?
livedadream wrote: » no i didnt, again i questioned the guys knowledge because theres no way he could know what condition its in. I actually know what condition its in. but because im not a tool, or want a pissing contest im keeping my gob shut. if you read the post i said no one but the 9 lads down there know what condition its in and the people they report to, but thanks for the pedantry, its really appreciated. and i didnt say anything about him not complimenting the whole operation i said it seems he had an agenda as he had nothing but negative stuff to say. but slow clap, youre really making reading the thread worthwhile..."
elastico wrote: » livedadream wrote: » try reading the thread, or even if that's too difficult, reading just my posts. Any chance you can answer the question, have you seen it to know what condition it's in or not?
Gadgetman496 wrote: » Anyone with 3rd party information should not be talking about it on a public forum if only to prevent the creation of a Chinese whisper.
TomOnBoard wrote: » Have I missed any updates regarding the analysis of the 'Black Box'? After it was recovered and earlier in the week, I seem to recall that it was expected to be analysed by the end of this week, which is I suppose now.
scuby wrote: » Ocean challenger on the way out of blacksod now On a separate note, kind of ironic that the church for Cpt. Fitzpatrick was on road r116 and the area of the church for Cpt Duffy was called blackrock !
de biz wrote: » Mark got his first commercial flying job in Ireland with Bryan Carpenter's Westair who managed Declan Ganleys 206. Mark was a good operator from the outset,focussed and a pro.
Cloudio9 wrote: » Nothing yet. I expect we'll have a leak of info soon, in advance of an interim report. I would say they're keen to have the bodies recovered before the interim report.
scuby wrote: » Ocean challenger on the way out of blacksod now
Gaoth Laidir wrote: He was from Blackrock, Co. Louth.
Storm 10 wrote: » Just in relation to the condition of the helicopter, on the night before the Pilot was recovered they said on RTE News the following morning that the ROV had spent the night cutting away a large section of the roof of the helicopter to allow the Navy Divers access.
JimWinters wrote: » Almost at Blackrock now and a small cargo barge Madelen is there too. It has a hydrolic crane onboard but it doesn't look capable of lifting 5+ tons (non-expert opinion)... Hopefully plans progressing well to recover the remaining crew
Deleted User wrote: » Seen as how you two have so much experience at this how about you get in contact with the two agencies and let them know where they've been going wrong and point them in the right direction. Irish Coast Guard (01) 6783454 Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport, Leeson Lane, Dublin, D02 TR60.IRCGDIVISION@dttas.ie Haulbowline Irish Naval Base, Co. Cork (021) 4864700 I'll be honest that's the clean version of the response I wanted to post, the original version contained no more than a couple of words but I couldn't decide which word or words were most appropriate.
Means Of Escape wrote: » Therefore it can be concluded that the structural integrity of the frame is severely compromised from the cutting , initial impact and the underwater forces on it The probability of the two being in or under it has to be very low unless they are harnessed inside The ROV would more than likely have been able to view the rear section during the cutting process under bright lights . Possible that the delay in surfacing the chopper is due to the marginal chance of recovery of the men .