corwill wrote: » Seriously, though, I want to hear 'exquisite gooooose' in a future audio montage, don't care how they shoe-horn it in.
Icemancometh wrote: » I wish I had the kind of friends who would cheer me up with an exquisite goose.
Arghus wrote: » Horrible injury and legitimate talking point that it was, I really felt they went overboard in the near two pods worth of discussion about Coleman's injury. I'd also like to hear a bit more analysis of the game itself, the Irish performance, what it means for the group etc, etc. Sometimes the guys can become fixated on one talking point from a game and neglect the wider picture.
Arghus wrote: » They've had that Argentinian journalist on occasion to talk about South American football and she's been excellent each and every time. More of her please!
Pter wrote: » I don't like the little audio montages which advertise last week's shows (which are played on the Monday shows and, infuriatingly, on the members only shows. Take a leaf out of Football Weekly - don't advertise your own show, on your own show. Advertise off the pod on social media, on sponsored ads or whatever, but don't spend a minute of a 45-minute show playing content I have already listened to. Especially when it's followed up with a 1 minute discussion of 'that interview was great, wasn't it'. I'm only saying this though because i listen to all the pods as they come out (and because its hump day in the week)
tomwaits48 wrote: » I think this is nit-picking really. It's non unusual for a traditional daily radio show to mention the previous day's topic of conversation in passing etc.
hidinginthebush wrote: I normally love the audio interludes, but good jaysus I hate the one with the Spanish commentator. Goes on waaay to long
sigmundv wrote: » Is that the guy who starting crying after a goal for Barcelona? That's a bad interlude and should be scrapped ASAP.
aperture_nuig wrote: » Pretty stupid I'd imagine, but it'd be no harm if it encourages people to think before they post garbage on the internet next time
riemann wrote: » I reckon the opposite. These comments are presumably written to get a reaction and by reading them out Ken is giving them exactly what they want, attention. It's still entertaining though.
Dots1982 wrote: » Was the political podcast a load of balls today or maybe it was too early in the morning after a late night?
lawred2 wrote: » Have to admit bailing on it after about 10 minutes.. Maybe I wasn't in the mood for it.
WindmillWarrior wrote: » It improved as it went on I thought...