silverharp wrote: » who cares if he had heroin on him, it was a domestic flight , its supposed to be an anti terrorism measure not a fishing exercise for contraband. After 10 seconds it would be clear he wouldn't have had anything on him that would bring down a jet. Also grandpagropesalot was being creepy, pretty much everywhere he used back of the hand he went over again with the front of his hand.
Heisenberg1 wrote: » Who cares if he had Heroin on him? I've heard it all now.
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is an agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that has authority over the security of the traveling public in the United States.
silverharp wrote: » to be more specific why should the TSA care, below is their mandate in a sentence. they aren't customs. they were set up after 9/11 if my memory is correct. If you don't mind having your children's genitals fondled by adults I admire you liberal views on parenting but I'd be furious
Galwayguy35 wrote: » If you have nothing to hide you've nothing to fear.
sbsquarepants wrote: » Last time I went on holidays, they (the irish they, not the tsa they!) patted down my 6 month old daughter in her mothers arms in Dublin Airport! The look on her face was comical, but when I tried to take a video they reacted like I'd just shouted Alhahu Akbar and pulled out a suspicious looking push button. I can still picture her face, it was hillarious:D
BENDYBINN wrote: » My question is if it was a seventy yr old man in shorts and tshirt would he have carried out the search in the exact same way? I'm not so sure.
conorhal wrote: » In all honesty, the kind of people that whip out phones and start filming people that are just trying to do their job are exactly the kind of people that deserve the rubber glove treatment. How would you react if if sombody, instead of behaving like an adult, started agressively waving a camera in your face and suggesting they were going to try and make a fool of you on the internet? .
papu wrote: » In all honesty you have no right to film them performing their duties without their consent. Filming pat down and security checking procedures is not welcomed as that information could be used to locate vulnerabilities. I also hate how clickbaity this title is.
sbsquarepants wrote: » Bit harsh, no? Or are you talking about the woman in the video? I haven't seen it. All I was doing (well trying to do) was get a funny picture of my 6 month old daughter. I was laughing, the mother was laughing, even the baby was laughing - there was no aggression at any stage. It's overkill plain and simple. By all means check, if you feel the need. They are there for a reason after all. But no need to be an asshole about it, and if it's something that can't be recorded for security reasons, which is a perfectly valid reason to my mind, then perhaps they shouldn't be doing in in full view of maybe a thousand people! It's either highly sensitive security stuff, or it aint I'm afraid. You can't have it both ways.
sbsquarepants wrote: » It's overkill plain and simple. By all means check, if you feel the need. They are there for a reason after all. But no need to be an asshole about it, and if it's something that can't be recorded for security reasons, which is a perfectly valid reason to my mind, then perhaps they shouldn't be doing in in full view of maybe a thousand people! It's either highly sensitive security stuff, or it aint I'm afraid. You can't have it both ways.
conorhal wrote: » How would you react if if sombody, instead of behaving like an adult, started agressively waving a camera in your face and suggesting they were going to try and make a fool of you on the internet? .
Glenster wrote: » Absolutely ridiculous. There is absolutely no law that says you cant record them performing a search on you or a member of your family. In Ireland. If there was they would let you know quick smart. You can record them all day, if a real garda has a suspicion that you are recording the vulnerabilities of the airport he can confiscate your phone.
All filming and photography at Cork Airport requires written permission in advance. Airport Security will remove anyone filming or photographing without this permission.
daa retains the right to review and delete if necessary any footage filmed on the airport campus.
papu wrote: » You should do some further investigations and calm down. Dublin airport I presume have a similar stance , as even when permission is given , You have no rights to record anyone , and the expectation of privacy to staff is afforded.
Galwayguy35 wrote: » If you have nothing to hide you've nothing to fear, I couldn't care less if they keep a record of the websites I visit if it's part of a plan to keep people safe. As for saying you'd rather risk being blown up instead well that's just stupid.
VinLieger wrote: » Not restricted by any specific law so would be curious to see if it would hold up in court after the fact Also the prevalence of streaming software kinda makes it impossible to enforce
papu wrote: » You should do some further investigations and calm down. Dublin airport I presume have a similar stance , as even when permission is given , You have no rights to record anyone , and the expectation of privacy to staff is afforded. So no, you really can't record them.
papu wrote: » Yes it is , Under Data Protection law, you have a right not to have your personal data collected, published or otherwise processed without your consent. This includes your image, and therefore covers photographs. These laws are created by the EU
Boom_Bap wrote: » I love how the wellbeing of a child is going woooooooosssshhhhhh in this thread so that the legalities of filming in security areas can be discussed.
VinLieger wrote: » If you've nothing to hide you've nothing to fear..... Look it works both ways
Glenster wrote: » All cameras are illegal then. What about CCTV? Don't talk nonsense.
