BoatMad wrote: » There's no way a 60 kWh battery could be supplied within the existing price point and that's the key issue for Nissan
unkel wrote: » This is it. Although how does Tesla do it with the 60kWh Model 3 that's also powerful and quick for $35k?
I also don't think I'd bother with their automation if you need to keep your hand on the wheel, I want something to take the sting out of driving home after night shifts.
unkel wrote: » That doesn't look very aerodynamic to me.
unkel wrote: » We'll have to see. If not, it can put those trash bags back on and go straight into the bin :pac:
listermint wrote: » Looks like ****e. Nissan pull the finger out there's money to be made. No chance of seeing 60kwh on that regardless of which article you read. You can bookmark this post
kceire wrote: » In fairness to Nissan, they have publically stated that if they wanted bigger batteries and much bigger range then it can be done no problem. The problem is keeping the car to a price point that makes it affordable.
listermint wrote: » Never said it couldn't be done. Said it won't be done.
unkel wrote: » So why are they making the new Leaf look like a big fat new Micra? Old Leaf as a big fat old Micra was bad enough
KCross wrote: » Isnt that how most of the manufacturers do it. They have a general design look/feel that runs through their range.
unkel wrote: » Not so sure about how relevant it is for many. I don't think I've ever seen a 6ft person in the back of a Leaf. Most owners would be families with children below 6 foot But true enough point, in that a 6 footer in the back of sleek aerodynamic cars like a Tesla Model S, Model 3 or a Hyundai Ioniq wouldn't have much head room.