batistuta9 wrote: » The trouble with projectors is they're not very practical for most houses. Really need a room for them, even the tiny ones aren't that neat when you've everything connected up to them, can be a mess of cables going up walls over ceilings, etc. You're right though you can get a v.good 1080p projector for about the price of a 42'' TV. however i wouldn't bother wasting money on any of the cheap or low resolution ones.
Míshásta wrote: » I don't understand people who say they never view or listen to RTE programmes. How do they keep informed about news, current affairs, sports, investigative documentaries or entertainment/culture events, etc., relevant to this island. RTE may have its faults but unless you want to live on a diet of Hollywood movies, Aussie soaps and Judge Judy, it's the best source. TV3 does provide some Irish content programmes but it's a very limited service.
murpho999 wrote: » It would cost you more than that to get up to the North and back. It's just one idea, there must be loads of ways to get rid of the TV licence and collect money. It would eliminate need for collectors, inspectors, administration, court costs etc.
Deleted User wrote: » This will only affect those that don't already pay their TV licence.
jimbobaloobob wrote: » using the rte player online should require your license number that way their fees are covering their services.
Silane wrote: » They should just make the whole thing subscription based like sky, let the people who want it pay for it and then you can access the online services too.
ancapailldorcha wrote: » It's been years since I watched RTÉ properly. It's a bit difficult living abroad but I'd no idea they were still filling their channels with foreign muck. Sounds like a subsidy for British and American studios to be honest more than a public service. The BBC is such an amazing service it's unreal. Cutting edge content and a wide array of public service broadcasts. Amazing that RTÉ couldn't have learned a few lessons from them but then that'd probably interfere with the handouts.
Cienciano wrote: » I assume you're joking. I haven't watched the news on RTE since I moved out of my parents house 15 years ago. This might be "news" to you, but there's other tv stations, newspapers, magazines, radio stations, podcasts and websites not only provide all what you think are exclusive to RTE, but they're multiple times better and they're either free or optional to pay for.
murpho999 wrote: » Not defending RTE but comparing BBC to RTE is unfair as they receive a licence fee paid by 60 million people so the budgets are huge. BBC have their fair share of rubbish along side top notch stuff as well though it must be said.
Grayson wrote: » After Hours is probably better than RTE news.
Karsini wrote: » I guess this would also include any business with desktop computers but no TV.
murpho999 wrote: » I still don't believe that so many people don't watch RTE ever. For Irish news alone it is the best source with actual video reports and interviews.
osarusan wrote: » They should deal with this first: This will just be another charge that people won't pay.
Permabear wrote: » This post had been deleted.
JackTaylorFan wrote: » Personally never understood why RTE are allowed to receive private revenue via advertisement whrn they receive funding through the TV tax. The same rule should apply as does the BBC. RTE's product is also ****e.
Deleted User wrote: » Then its a property tax, and would be simpler and more efficient to collect as that.
McGaggs wrote: » Entertainment events? I can live fine without Lottie Ryan, thanks. Boards fills me in on all the local news I need. I don't recall ever seeing decent rte documentary *Awaits angry posts listing decent documentaries*