johnnyw20 wrote: » as it is her body
johnnyw20 wrote: I don't mind the wrist tattoo but I cringe every time I see the ankle one. Would I be wrong to ask her if she would consider getting it removed? She even told me last week she regrets the tattoos
Teyla Emmagan wrote: » Why don't you suggest she gets it removed then? It sounds like neither of you like it. It's a long and expensive process though.
amtc wrote: » I do question why people have small hidden ones if they are that proud of them.
amtc wrote: » Personally I wouldn't have one. I don't have any view really about them in relationships but I do question why people have small hidden ones if they are that proud of them.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: » The argument that it's your body and what you do with it is none of your partners business is totally bogus. If I let myself go via poor diet, no exercise etc and ballooned in weight terms it wouldn't be surprising if my wife no longer found me attractive and our relationship suffered. As a bloke I feel some obligation to remain attractive to my wife. If I went out of my way to do something which I knew in advance made me less attractive to her I wouldn't be surprised if she reacted negatively.
leggo wrote: » And in that case your wife's choice would be whether she wants to stay with you or not, in which she has to accept you if she does. At best she can state how your letting yourself go makes her feel and you can choose to respond to it or not based on that, but she has no right to pressure or force you to change who you are or what you do with your body, even in a marriage. That's when the line is crossed into controlling territory. We're all independent people still with a right to that independence, irrespective of any partnerships we've agreed to. And the only person you ever have any kind of control or authority over on this planet (except for young children obviously) is yourself. The only time you get to have a say with a partner, and even then it's limited how much you can do, is if they're engaging in behaviour that's damaging to themselves, you, others or the family as a unit. Tattoos don't count.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: » Complete BS. As partners you share each others lives. Your body is not an independent element which the other person has no interest in. It is in fact a very important element in a healthy sexual relationship so you absolutely have an interest in your partners body. If they do something which they know in advance will be received negatively by you they are overtly or subliminally sending you a clear message. How you react to that message is up to you. BTW, if I put on a few stone and my wife ceases to find me sexually attractive she can indeed tell me how she feels and if I want to repair the relationship I can decide to get off my ar$e, do some exercise and stop eating takeaways in order to lose the extra weight I temporarily gained. You can't do that with something like a tattoo. It's permanent so once it's done it's a bit late to be having the chat about how your other half feels about it. The time for doing that in a respectful loving relationship is before you get the tattoo not afterwards.
lifeandtimes wrote: » Ok but if he felt so strong about it then why did he say it was ok....twice? Being busy isn't an excuse, he was able to reply to say it's ok twice but then when she has them he isn't?
lifeandtimes wrote: » Sounds to me like op is just looking for an excuse to end the relationship.
leggo wrote: » And this is complete BS, in the literal sense, because you're saying one thing while meaning another. You seem to be dancing around wanting to be able to control another person's life. 'Sharing' in this instance means 'do what I want' and 'having an interest' seems to mean 'this is mine to dictate'. Dress it up flowery if you like, it all boils down to the same thing. You've no right to tell someone else what to do. Partners aren't with you because they're looking for someone to tell them what to wear, how to dress, how to keep their bodies etc. For the third time I'll say it: the only thing you do have a right to decide is if you, as an independent person capable of thinking for yourself, want to still be with this other independent person. That's your option.
Theyaintforme wrote: » Tattoos are a bit of an irrational deal breaker for me too. I don't know why, but I hate them, and that's probably understating it. It's not something I'm going to change my mind on and is something I would act on. Even back in my dating days the first sight of a tat and I'd be gone, but they weren't as common / prevalent then. I'm just repulsed by them. Funny thing is that if it ever comes up in conversation I'm the one that's in the wrong. If asked my opinion on a piece of body art I'll give it, eg. What do you think of this? Eh, it's not to my taste, I'm not into tattoos, it's like your saying you are meat eater to a vegan to some people. but i have never offered without being asked. In my opinion each to their own. But with choice come consequences, don't expect everyone to love what you love. Often the thing with these things is the ones that exercise their free choice to be or do something never recognise that others have the choice not to agree with or love the same thing. So OP, if I were in your shoes I'd be gone, I don't know why but I feel that deeply about it. I would not expect to be understood or even expect them to remove the tat. Each to their own and that's a 2 way street.
Hair of the Dog wrote: » I would encourage you to encourage her to get it removed. I don't like tattoos either and some would be a deal breaker for me. Worst are arm tattoos on a woman. Looks disgustingly masculine.
infogiver wrote: » It's not so much the tattoo I hate as the mentality behind the thought process in getting a tattoo. It's like a herd instinct or something, like a herd of cattle heading for the milking parlour in the evening. It's like youve no mind of your own, no independent thought processes, a gang of girls heading in to get "inked" . "Ohh a butterfly ohh a dolphin ohh something something in sandskrit" How very original. It's about as original as having a Tesco Clubcard.
Lady is a tramp wrote: » You say the wrist one doesn't bother you, just the ankle one. Why not just avoid looking there? Don't make it into a bigger deal than it is. Say if the two of ye went on to have children, and she ended up with bad stretchmarks all over her tummy. I mean, it wouldn't be visually appealing, but you'd hardly end the relationship over something like that - surely she means more to you than just her physical appearance? I wouldn't go asking her to get it removed - hardly worth the money when it's in a fairly discreet place and can be easily covered anyways.