jh79 wrote: » So what term apllies to the Real IRA? I'm not on their side either , can I call them terrorists ? Dissident seems a bit soft for what they have done.
Esel wrote: » That link is an amazing, enlightening analysis.
timthumbni wrote: » Wasn't overly concerned about Arlene going one way or the other. Considering her own very personal traumas caused by the IRA not once, but twice then I certainly wouldn't have blamed her for not going. Re sincere It would seem so. She would have had a lot of pressure not to attend I'm sure, so the fact she did go seems genuine. Certainly more genuine than www.gerry.com turning the graveside oration into some sort of weird live party political broadcast.
timthumbni wrote: » No, but you have gerrys permission to call them dissident freedom fighters. But totally unlike their big brothers in the IRA the real Ira like to bomb, shoot and batter anyone that disagrees with them whereas the Ira liked to ....... oh wait..
steddyeddy wrote: » He was speaking at the funeral of his friend. I don't think he cared what hardcore unionists think.
timthumbni wrote: » I don't think he cares what any shade of unionist think either at his buddy's funeral or not. And if he going to go all ohh ahh up the ra then why even bother referring to unionists at all? He's like that embarrassing uncle at family weddings that has a few too many and then makes a show of himself during the speeches.
timthumbni wrote: » Sorry, but saying positive things then more or less the equivalent of singing ooh ahh up the ra yeohhhhh to please the more simpleton types in the crowd is just plain weird. Why did he even bother? I genuinely hope that Adams sticks around for a lot longer as he seems to drop himself in it every time he opens his gnashers to speak.
Deleted User wrote: » All this really sailed over your wee narrow minded personae didn't it? Luckily it seems you're not in a position of responsibilty as regards the governance of NI. Carry on with your sillyness & self gratification.
FrancieBrady wrote: » He and his buddy were instrumental in dismantling the Unionist sectarian state, he was right and justified in mentioning that at his friends funeral. Wasn't somebody decrying 'airbrushing' earlier. Time Unionists grew up and stopped spitting the dummy out every time somebody mentions the RA.
timthumbni wrote: » He and his buddy were instrumental in supporting the IRA murder of children, women and men in NI, the republic and mainland uk and further afield. And I'm sure the IRA blowing up of 2 wee boys outside a mcdonalds in a northern English town in the 90s really helped dismantle the state. The IRAs one and only goal was Brits out and a UI. Both of which they failed at by blowing kids up and shooting a young recently new mother in the head because they were census workers and Protestant.(j matters) (Wasn't that in mcguinness patch btw?) I wonder if he had any information about that one?????
Junkyard Tom wrote: » The fact of the matter was that the people least likely to be killed during the troubles were Protestant/Unionist civilians and those most likely to be killed were Security Forces by the PIRA and Catholic civilians by unionist paramilitaries. Some people have this bizarre image that the troubles was a fight between the IRA and unionist paramilitaries. Unionist paramilitaries killed more of each other feuding than they did PIRA. PIRA blew more of themselves up in premature explosions than killed unionist paramilitaries.
Deleted User wrote: » Tim did you read Jo Berry's tweet? Because this repetitive self gratifying sh*te from you is particularly pathetic and cringe inducing at this stage.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » Tim voted against the Good Friday Agreement and probably thinks Sinn Fein shouldn't be governing. How do you reason with people with such views?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Tim only reads the Gospel According To Loyalism What he fails to see is that most reasonable decent people believe now that the greater good was served. They were represented at the funeral yesterday.
timthumbni wrote: » What of it?
Ye sound very snobbish sometimes.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » You're on the wrong side of history and are one of an ever-decreasing number of paleo-unionists.
timthumbni wrote: » It seems that in the minds of republicans narrow minded means not accepting the current SF line. Whatever that happens to be at any particular time. They also think it is narrow minded not to think what was going through the wee poor downtrodden Ira mans head as he planted a bomb in a busy street, bus station etc packed with women, men and children. I've said before I don't feel the need to thank anyone because they suddenly decide that blowing people up or shooting them in the back isn't working or going down too well with "world opinion". Hence why I was honest and said I had little respect for mcguiness and I suspect if I or anyone else know the full extent of his actions I would have even less. It's time republicans stop asking for thanks for stopping murdering people and then saying "look at me helping peace by not killing people anymore" I didn't claim to be involved with the governance of NI. This is a fecking internet message board after all. Its good to hear from all opinions especially as I am an actual Norn Iron unionist. Otherwise this thread would be like a republican circle jerk ffs...
timthumbni wrote: » Another republican fail Francine. If you had been a long term reader of my other posts (as you claim to have done) you would know I care not a jot for loyalists and lump them in with the Irish republican terrorists such as the Ira, inla, real Ira, Ciara, the new Ira, the I can't believe it's not the Ira etc etc.