Paddytheman wrote: » What kind of repair work if you don't mind me asking, going through the process too and wondering what you can/should expect to have fixed when buying second hand?
RaulDublin wrote: » Re plumb pipeworks, new showers and bath and extra insulation .there's work to be done in the garage but I've asked the vendor to get ot done.
Paddytheman wrote: » Sorry you've asked the vendor to get a list of the repair work that needs to be done? I don't get it, is it not your surveyor who provides a list of issues which you can then discuss with the vendor?
RaulDublin wrote: » We just got a survey done for a house in castleknock area and the bank valuation surveyor feels that the asking price is too high and it should be around 15 K lower than the current sale agreed price . I have already gone back to the vendor asking for a list of repair work which needs to be carried out and they are yet to come back . However similar properties with similar size sold recently in the same area in 2017 seem to have been sold for more than the current price . The estimate of the work involved in around 8-10 , which will still leave the house overvalued be around 5- 10 K . Would the banks still lend in this case ?
trobbin wrote: » Banks are pushing mortgages very aggressively ATM, adverts everywhere (see top of page. Anyway, if the bank think the price is to high by 15k, I would really worry about buying the house. IMO, the surveyor is doing you a favour. I know how banks are approaching mortgages ATM, they'll happily give a mortgage on a massively overvalued house, let's be honest, if they weren't, there wouldn't be any mortgages being given out. But they'll only do so if your deposit is large enough. Without coming across cheeky, you're probably only handing up a 10/20% deposit.
listermint wrote: » Most valuers actually use daft as a guide for house prices and show similar example homes as a reference for their estimate. Have you considered contacting the valuer with your examples as you seem to be adamant the pricing is comparable
nosilver wrote: » can you show an example fo that or is it just some barstool comment. I got a valuation done recently and the valuer HAD to show three comparables that had sold in the area and they had to be referenced through Property Price Register. The valuer also had to comment on the general area, the condidtion of the house, the services available, any work the required doing and the estimated letting value. He said the form was similar for all banks and quite different to a few years ago when it was just a number in a box.
Samuel T. Cogley wrote: » Christ I have never heard of this happening, I sincerely hope that we starting to see valuations based on some sensible yardstick, even if it is only similar properties in the area. I was literally told by a valuer during the boom "market value is whatever you're willing to pay". It might only be a small part of the problem but it's a problem nevertheless.
Mooooo wrote: » That is what market value is tho, it's whatever anyone is willing to pay.
nosilver wrote: » can you show an example fo that <mod snip > I got a valuation done recently and the valuer HAD to show three comparables that had sold in the area and they had to be referenced through Property Price Register. The valuer also had to comment on the general area, the condidtion of the house, the services available, any work the required doing and the estimated letting value. He said the form was similar for all banks and quite different to a few years ago when it was just a number in a box.
Lumen wrote: » I always assumed that the main purpose of the valuation was to deter fraud, e.g. I sell a garden shed to my brother for 1m secured with an 80% mortgage, he defaults on the mortgage and goes bankrupt, we split the 800k.
Water John wrote: » You picked the valuer from a list supplied by the lender, I presume. You could pick another for a second opinion.
Water John wrote: » AIB use a list.
RaulDublin wrote: » When i spoke to them i felt that they were quite realistic in their estimate of the Property value . It was on the mkt for 450 k originally before we went sale agreed .there had been a few bids over 450 already ... I also think that the bank surveyor did not take the 3 houses i mentioned in my previous post into account...
reick wrote: » There were higher bids than 450k, but they agreed to sell to you at 450 (a lower price)? Or the others pulled out? That might indicate some problem on a 450K or greater valuation?
Water John wrote: » Yes, €100 + VAT.
Eric Cartman wrote: » If that garden shed was in dublin 4 and south facing they'd probably say it was a steal because the neighbours either side sold for 1.25 million :pac: