Itziger wrote: » Dave, as you probably realised, I was kinda taking the Michael with that one!
Itziger wrote: » True, but isn't that the same for the runner who's built up from 6 miles @ MP to 16 miles @ MP? What does that runner do for the last 10?? No 'serious' runner does a 26.2 mile training run at MP, right??? I'm purely curious now here. I'd like to hear from anyone who's done it or has read about it. As ever, it means a year of trial and error of course but it might suit some more than the short MP to Long MP plan.
Itziger wrote: » This thread gone quiet again and if there's one thread that can't be allowed to go quiet......... I've started my real marathon training I feel now. Last Sunday was the first long run with some MP stuff. Did 12k of it after 10k warm up, then a bit to cool down. This midweek I did 7k of HM and M pace mixed in a total of 15k run. To be honest I found the structured bit hard because the difference between 500 metres of HM and 500 metres of M is fairly small. Got the feeling that the faster stuff was a bit too fast and the slower a bit too slow. I'll try more of these types though as I loved Krusty's point about discovering that the M pace sections are the easy ones and so your brain says, 'Ah, that's better, I can slow to this pace for a while now'. Hopefully the brain and other bits and pieces come to form a special relationship with 4.10/6.45 (km/mile) pace and doing 42.xx kms of it proves easier than previous efforts. Some joints and muscles are less than impressed but so far I can run, and that's what counts.
Duanington wrote: » what's the target marathon Itziger? ( apologies, you may have mentioned it previously )
Itziger wrote: » This thread gone quiet again and if there's one thread that can't be allowed to go quiet.........
ThebitterLemon wrote: » I'm almost embarrassed to come onto this log now, Ive had more attempts at sub 3 than Donal Trump has had politically incorrect statements! Trying to get the weary wagon in shape to finish the job this summer!! TbL
Krusty_Clown wrote: » A recent Magness/Marcus podcast touched on the subject of mastering the marathon, with particular reference to the difference between good marathon runners and less successful marathon runners (and I'm kind of paraphrasing here), but what it essentially came down to was this: there are so many things that can go wrong in a marathon (14 apparently!) and you only need one of those things to go wrong to spoil your race. Open shoe-lace, a trip, digestion issues, missed/wrong nutrition, weather, etc. The suggestion was that everybody has a marathon that doesn't go to plan at some point. It's not like a 5k, where you can pick yourself up and run another one a few weeks later. The key point is: what makes a good marathon runner, is the ability to keep driving forward despite setbacks or missing your goals. The ability to reset, re-motivate yourself, to keep plugging away towards your goal. That's what defines more successful marathon runners. So best of luck getting the weary wagon back on track. You'll never regret the time you spent chasing a lofty goal, just the day you decided to pack it in.
hot buttered scones wrote: » Cheers for that. I'll have listen later on. The optimistic side of me is saying "well you've already had a marathon that didn't go to plan, so at least you've got that out of the way early on" - but its not that easy is it? Sub 3 is my long term goal I suppose - currently I'm just plugging away trying to get my time down, and when whatever I'm doing stops working, I'll come back here for some tips.
TFBubendorfer wrote: » Well, it took me 15 marathons to finally break 3, so it definitely can work as a long-term project!
ThebitterLemon wrote: » 15, fifteen not fifty? Jesus piss off you're a complete failure in the failure stakes, I've almost 13,000 TbL
tang1 wrote: » Fixed that for you C!!!!!
Krusty_Clown wrote: » It's not like a 5k, where you can pick yourself up and run another one a few weeks later.
Enduro wrote: » Did they have anything to back that up at all? (I keep asking for any science or evidence behind these kind of assertions about only 2 marathons per year etc. and have yet to get a trace of anything from anyone)
Krusty_Clown wrote: » Back what up? That you can't chase a marathon PB every couple of weeks? Go for it. Report back
davedanon wrote: » There must be a fair amount of empirical evidence around in respect of both propositions, at this stage...
Enduro wrote: » You would think there would be, but I can't find any. Nor can anyone seem to point me in the direction of research / analysis showing it.
sideswipe wrote: » With all due respect Enduro, you don't have to be able to link research/analysis for common sense.
sideswipe wrote: » Somebody who can train and execute a marathon to the maximum of their ability and then do it again with improved results days later is an outlier. Most people couldn't (shouldn't) take that risk.
Enduro wrote: » Unless the "Common Sense" is wrong, as turns out to be the case in many cases. It's not that long ago that it was common sense that you just had to do loads of static stretching before and after any running, for example. My favourite all time example of orthodoxy being thrown out the window by someone daring to question recieved wisdom is this one. I believe the reference was to weeks, not days. And again, can you point me to any evidence / research / emperical statistics of any kind to support that? Edit: And to add.... What "Risk"?! The "risk" of running a sub-optimal marathon or DNFing? It doesn't strike me as something to be overly concerned about. On the contary achieving your best marathon performance requires risk taking, pushing yourself to you absolute limits.
ThebitterLemon wrote: » Am I still in the sub 3 support thread... TbL