Parliament is on lockdown after gunshots were heard outside the Palace of Westminster.
Frank Sinatra wrote: » She was there, we were not. She saw him, we didn't. I dunno about you, but I'm inclined to believe eye-witnesses and the news rather than ignore them. Someone mentioned earlier in the thread that in the UK it's more meant towards Pakistani, as opposed to Asian meaning in/around China and Japan for the US. I'm not British so I don't know and I don't necessarily believe it. Just what I read.
rabjoshu wrote: » "heavily tooled up officers" says Kay snigger
Frank Sinatra wrote: » She was there, we were not. She saw him, we didn't. I dunno about you, but I'm inclined to believe eye-witnesses
CoolHandBandit wrote: » Think it's fairly obvious what this is. Don't get this " no speculation " stuff. I'm guessing this wasn't a catholic priest for instance.
CelticRambler wrote: » Yeah, you might be right there ... Try Canary Wharf, Bishopsgate, Deal, Omagh, Manchester, Birmingham, Brighton. Seeing as "the Irish" have been responsible for more terrorist deaths in the UK alone than any other nationality's caused in the whole of the EU, we shouldn't be allowed off the island. :mad: Yeah, right. I take it you don't know who Martin McGuinness is/was ... :rolleyes:
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » London Eye shut down, people trapped inside.
SAMTALK wrote: » Never fails to amaze me that when a tragedy is unfolding people here like nothing better than having a snipe at each other and trying to prove each other wrong
Grayson wrote: » Secondly what does Asian mean? Indian, Japanese, Arabic?
Call Me Jimmy wrote: » "Many people not knowing whether to run or film" said the sky reporter. Jesus.
CelticRambler wrote: » Yeah, right. I take it you don't know who Martin McGuinness is/was ... :rolleyes:
Grayson wrote: » Firstly we we have no reason to believe her.
Call Me Jimmy wrote: » I'm very surprised by what I'm hearing. Based on UK's relative lack of attacks (compared to France of course) it's the last place I thought they'd be able to kill anyone. That's the point I suppose.
andekwarhola wrote: » I'm sure most of the ghouls that take photos are purely motivated by providing Pulitzer level historical documentation for the edification of future generations alright.