califano wrote: » So would these judges be athletic commission judges out of the favour of UFC interference like in the US?.
califano wrote: » Sorry badly worded. out of favour was meant to be a way of saying 'not being directly employed like in the ufc therefore less likely to be under instruction'. Subcomandante Marcos answered that one anyway. I trust to a good degree in the referees integrity(more than the scoring judges), many of them are ex fighters and have a love for the game. But if your being directly employed then you are more under the influence of the franchise. An example of this would be lets say Khabib was fighting McGregor in CW. Then i can see there being a pre fight card directive chat with all referees saying look we dont want something on the ground going nowhere ok, were all about entertaining fights, the crowd dont like seeing clinches on the ground so stand it up quickly if its on the ground. The real meaning is that they know their golden boys best chance is when its standing up and likely road to defeat in the JJ on the ground. I would be fairly confident referees at different shows would be informed of the way to ref in certain aspects of the fight. The UFC couldnt have this type of instruction influence with athletic state commission judges.
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » If you want proof of how crooked CW is as a promotion watch the Pimblett vs Erosa fight. Erosa murdered him and still lost. Pimblett is the champion,managed by the owner of the promotion who also happen to pick the judges and select judging criteria Joke shop.
califano wrote: » ACB 54: Khalidov vs. Barnatt *Live Streaming 8pm* Fight Card:Mamed Khalidovvs. Luke BarnettMike Wilkinson vs. Brendan Loughnane Asambek Saidov vs. Ion Pascu Saul Rogers vs Aurel Pirtea Ali Bagov vs. Bubba Jenkins Amirkhan Adaev vs. Joshua Aveles Batraz Agnaev vs Max Nunes Rakhman Dzhanaev vs. Adam Zajac Danny Mitchell vs. Andrew DeVent
califano wrote: » The real meaning is that they know their golden boys best chance is when its standing up and likely road to defeat in the JJ on the ground. I would be fairly confident referees at different shows would be informed of the way to ref in certain aspects of the fight. The UFC couldnt have this type of instruction influence with athletic state commission judges.
dulux99 wrote: » Dillon Danis has signed with Bellator and theres a predictably cringe worthy interview with him up on Severemma now. I've been quite vocal about how embarrassing I find James Gallagher and I suppose deep-down I could probably acknowledge that he's a young guy who will naturally idolise his superstar team mate.... There is no such excuse for the absolute cringe machine that is Dillon Danis. The shameless verbatim stealing of McGregors lines is actually tough to watch. The sad part is Bellator will, like they have with JG, line up absolute bums for Danis to beat and we'll have to suffer him for the next couple of years at least.
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » They'll put him in with Ralek Gracie and Ralek will probably knock the snot out of him on the feet.
Wrongway1985 wrote: » Bader v Davis II supposedly in the works for that same event too.
ASOT wrote: » Lima v Larkin & Chandler v Primus added to 180 also. Some card.
ricero wrote: » Anyone know what tv station are showing cage kings 82 next weekend ? I really want to watch the paddy pimblett fight