Grayson wrote: » This thread is just a nasty echo chamber at this stage.
ivytwine wrote: » Set one up? I mean in the States there's the Innocence Project, that helps people falsely accused of all sorts of crimes and it's international I think. Like I don't know what you want anyone to say here. False accusations aren't common. We have a low conviction rate in this country. Rape itself is definitely a bigger issue than false accusations, surely?
please helpThank YOU wrote: » we have a rape support network but where is the network for false accused of rape network support? why is there none ?
Widdershins wrote: » What! :mad:
ivytwine wrote: » it was after the RCC refused to hand over details of its clients over to Tusla.
please helpThank YOU wrote: » Louise o Neill says we have rape culture in Ireland and funding gets cut 70%per cent what is louise o neill and her rape culture in Ireland saying about this?
please helpThank YOU wrote: » False accusation of rape are myths we are told by the same people who tells us we have a rape culture the likes of Louise o neill
ivytwine wrote: » RCC got its funding cut by 70% last year, to answer one of your questions. Rape happens, most people do not falsely accuse. My beef with "rape culture" is that it doesn't address the issue in any practical manner.
please helpThank YOU wrote: » Louise o Niell rape culture how many people have being convicted of rape in Ireland in last 5 years? how many people have being convicted of making false accusations of rape in the last 5 years ? how much funding has the rape crisis Centre and one in four received in last 5 years? how much facts when I mean Facts I mean people who have being convicted of rape in the last 5 years to prove what Louise o Neill rape culture Ireland claims and she got facts and figures to prove this hearsay?
Sweetemotion wrote: » Do you also find the people commenting on Donald Trump, really, really weird?
Widdershins wrote: » I don't think it was that far-fetched. I think there was a legislation change being discussed in the gentlemens forum here, regarding the subject. Hopefully you're correct.
Wibbs wrote: » Eh no. Just no. This kinda thing is precisely the kind of arm waving hysterical nonsense that drives wedges between people. Just like the witterings of Ms O'N and her ilk(and not just on her "side"). .
Candie wrote: » I don't think the thread should necessarily be shut down, but there seems to be an element of some people checking her social media platforms to mine things to criticise. I find that a bit distasteful as would most people, and there is a danger of a feeding frenzy mentality when her every public utterance is examined for an opportunity to complain. Regarding the doctor, I got an appointment today for Monday morning and it's not something I can really postpone regardless of any other plans I may have had. I don't see why we can't extend the benefit of the doubt to someone when they say they have a doctors appointment that can't be delayed. There are plenty of reasons to call LON a hypocrite but that shouldn't be one of them. I never heard of her outside of AH, which also begs the question that if people resent the publicity and exposure she has, then why are they giving her more?
please helpThank YOU wrote: » Thank You widdershins very scary dark times ahead for Ireland with Louise o Neill rape culture we are gone back in time middle ages dark times like the Salem witch trials that in the 1668 Joseph glanvil claimed there was witches Witch Culture like Louise o Neill rape culture .
anna080 wrote: » If you're referring to what I said, I never said she lied about going to the doctor. In fact I believe she was at an appointment. What I don't get was why she alluded all week to be in attendance of the march last Wednesday. A march which she encouraged people to take the day off work for- yet was a no show herself- people debated her absence for a few pages and moved on in the discussion. Many people only brought up the doctor/therapy/meeting points to say she would have known in advance she was going so why say she's going to the march. Nobody (AFAIK) said she was a "lying bitch" and never went to the doctor. If I'm wrong please point me to the post which stated that.
Grayson wrote: » Go back through the thread. You'll see that other posters brought up the doctors appointment and gave out **** about it. It's only a few pages back. I suggested that she might actually have had an appointment or need to go to a doctor. The **** that people said about her. People started saying she's lying about it. Or that it's not important and she should skip it for the march. Because she didn't skip it, she's a hypocrite. Once again, I'm not the person who brought it up. Someone else did as a way to criticise her. All I said was that maybe she actually did have an appointment. I also said it's weird going on about her doctors appointment. This thread has got to the stage where it's verging on internet stalking. Following her every social media post and commenting on her personal life. It's really, really weird.
Grayson wrote: » Trying to get a thread shutdown? WTF are you talking about?
Grayson wrote: » Firstly. Please use full stops. Secondly, what does the bolded bit mean? Thirdly I attached a screenshot.