snowflaker wrote: » Homeopathy ftw
Ayuntamiento wrote: » Realistically the plethora of pills that 'big pharma' have developed are in response to the fact that most people are lazy and want to pop a tablet rather than address the underlying issue that's causing their diabetes/blood pressure/high cholesterol, etc. I have none of the aforementioned health issues because I run 60 miles per week, eat sensibly and have never smoked. I work with people who have every chronic health issue under the sun. I know for a fact that they could be 'cured' if they put the same hard work that I do into into maintaining their health. God help the poor GP who actually calls you out on the fact that you're fat and basically killing yourself through your own inertia. If the aim of GP is customer satisfaction (it is a business after all) they may as well prescribe you a pill rather than tell you the truth.
Graces7 wrote: » That is very harsh indeed. I was fit and careful and all you say when I fell ill. Highly trained in advanced classsical ballet Did not drink or smoke ,, careful diet My problem with some aspects of Western meds, when you are on eg a medical card and have a condition difficlut to diagnose, is the pelthora of pills for every symptom When i finally after 30 years gt the correct name for my illness, I was on 28 pills a day.. some to counter the side effects of the others. I got myself off everything including benzos and now take only what I absolutely need and I decide what that is. and check everything offered. Western meds can save and heal but it can also destroy. Had I not taken matters into my own hands?
thelad95 wrote: » By Western Medicine, I mean the plethora of pills available for any sort of physical ailment from a headache to heart disease.
MonkieSocks wrote: » Eat a stick of chalk....that will cure it
farmerwifelet wrote: » as Dara O'Brian says when you are hit by a car do you want a (western) medical doctor or the person shouting "stand back everyone im an aromoatherapist i can save them"? im opting for the MD and the pills
Shenshen wrote: » I would argue that this is neither the fault of the science of medicine in general, nor of the pharma industry, it's a failing on behalf of your doctors to diagnose correctly.Not that I'd blame them, I understand that the single most difficult aspect in treating any illness is diagnosing it correctly. There are only so many symptoms a human being will display, and they could point to so many different things actually going wrong underneath the skin. Some things are easy enough to identify, such as broken bones, but if you're trying to find the cause of, say, recurring migraines it can take years of observation and tests.
Deleted User wrote: » Western medicine is keeping my girlfriend alive and those stomach acid tablets you're on about stop her stomach from eating itself as a side effect of the steroids.Should she just walk it off and accept the five-years-till-you-die prognosis that existed for her a few decades ago?
thelad95 wrote: » By Western Medicine, I mean the plethora of pills available for any sort of physical ailment from a headache to heart disease. From my experience, I think it's gone down the wrong path in that nearly everything is now directed towards treating symptoms instead of finding the cause of physical ailments and creating medicine to eradicate the cause. I don't buy into the big pharma conspiracy theory where cures are hidden but I do believe pharmaceutical companies do direct their efforts to creating symptom cures as opposed to disease cures knowing which is more profitable.Take for example, the incredibly common condition of acid reflux, also known as heartburn. Any GP quack will tell you that between PPI's and antacids you'll be on medication for the rest of your life. So after millions of years of evolution apparently it's perfectly normal for acid to start flowing up into your throat. Of course there's a cause and cure but it's far more profitable for pharma to churn out treatment drugs which make billions annually. What are your thoughts?
quadrifoglio verde wrote: » No matter what your symptoms, doctor google will always diagnose death is on the way
Academic wrote: » This is a pretty unique definition of "Western medicine," to put it mildly.
Graces7 wrote: » I agree with some of your words ie it was a total failiure by GPs etc. Disagree with what I have bolded. But then this was the NHS in the UK then medical card here and if you have private health care here that is a very different matter. You can call the shots. And the misdiagnosis lasted 30 years as inappropriate meds were masking reality and doing great and permanent damage. Which is with me until the end of my days now I have no trust left in drs frankly. None. Or basically for me in what they practice.In the UK drs have same power as the priests used to have here and are all but impossible to deal with sensibly. I got myself off damaging and highly addictive meds with no help except a wonderful internet group So trust if you choose. I do not . :eek: Currently without a GP since my move, and I think I will leave it like that. Have had enough. Oh and if you think well she does not give them a chance? The mess they have left my wrist in after a simple break .... And yes I am very glad you get good care and I mean that. I really and honestly do. Bless you! And the OP did ask !
thelad95 wrote: » [...] Take for example, the incredibly common condition of acid reflux, also known as heartburn. Any GP quack will tell you that between PPI's and antacids you'll be on medication for the rest of your life. So after millions of years of evolution apparently it's perfectly normal for acid to start flowing up into your throat. Of course there's a cause and cure but it's far more profitable for pharma to churn out treatment drugs which make billions annually. What are your thoughts?
ToddyDoody wrote: » It is anyway irregardless
Jrop wrote: » While I advocate eating healthily and exercising. I think it can dangerous to go the 'alternative medicine' route. Like the woman in New Zealand who thinks a vegan diet will cure her breast cancer.
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » Does she think she's as clever as Steve Jobs ? He was worth billions and would probably be alive if he had listened to doctors.
thelad95 wrote: » By Western Medicine, I mean the plethora of pills available for any sort of physical ailment from a headache to heart disease. From my experience, I think it's gone down the wrong path in that nearly everything is now directed towards treating symptoms instead of finding the cause of physical ailments and creating medicine to eradicate the cause. I don't buy into the big pharma conspiracy theory where cures are hidden but I do believe pharmaceutical companies do direct their efforts to creating symptom cures as opposed to disease cures knowing which is more profitable. Take for example, the incredibly common condition of acid reflux, also known as heartburn. Any GP quack will tell you that between PPI's and antacids you'll be on medication for the rest of your life. So after millions of years of evolution apparently it's perfectly normal for acid to start flowing up into your throat. Of course there's a cause and cure but it's far more profitable for pharma to churn out treatment drugs which make billions annually. What are your thoughts?
Jawgap wrote: » that would not be my experience. i lived in the Uk for a number of years and interacted with the NHS on a number of occasions. Two examples stand out for me...... ......the consultant who was dealing with a minor liver complaint I was suffering from who followed up personally with me on results and who, when I expressed an interest in learning more about the condition, sent me on a series of journal articles to read up on and ask questions about. ....the team who treated one of my kids when they were seriously ill. The doctors took the time to explain everything about his care and make sure we had ample opportunity to ask questions. They also made sure we had access to a patient advocacy service. And then later we were invited in for a review of his treatment and the consultant and his team led us through every step they took and highlighted areas they felt they'd got wrong and admitted to stuff they'd have done differently In my experience, the clinicians in the NHS were much more open to discussion and being questioned than HSE staff, and quicker to provide explanations and making sure you understood what was going on.