TheIrishGrover wrote: » Loved the film. Thought the acting was top notch. Was afraid that the "adult" nature would be slapped in swearing and obvious CGI blood but it actually fit and was not just there for a Deadpool effect.
bilbot79 wrote: » There was an enormous amount of stabbing deaths in it. Not as much as in London has fallen but a lot. I loved the bit where Charles was having a seizure and Logan was stabbing the mannequin challenge folks
TheIrishGrover wrote: » Yeah. That, for me, wash the harshest moment in the film: Brutally taking them out then they couldn't defend themselves: You were never going "Yeah, go for it Wolvie!", you were sympathising with them and even thinking "Ouch, that was uncalled for"
eviltimeban wrote: » ^ Yeah I was thinking about that Las Vegas scene the other day, it really was Logan at his most brutally uncompromising. It reminded me of the John Wick approach - if you're in my way, you die.
TerrorFirmer wrote: » The first guy, you can actually see his eyes slowly turning to Logan, and there's a haunting sense in terror in them - he knows what's about to happen and he's powerless to do a thing about it. The film is just packed with subtle brutality from start to finish.
Sabre0001 wrote: » No Good Deed (the pre/post credit scene with Logan in North America)
Tom.D.BJJ wrote: » How do they explain Logans broken spirit in he movie? Its well explained in the comic, but they changed it for the movie where Charles killed the XMen, rather than Logan
will56 wrote: » Just seen this last night, all I can say is WOW ! Its actually a bit frustrating that its taken 17 years to get a grown up, adult targeted, violent depiction of Wolverine. Hugh Jackman is excellent in his portrayal of the grissly, fed up Logan who's just had enough of it all. Some random thoughts though The lack of other mutants. Am I correct in thinking that the no new mutants is down to the gene therapy that the big bad mentioned ? The Lack of X-men is down to the Westchester incident along with Mutants having been hunted down by transigen (using Caliban) ? And Finally, one bullet killing X-24 ? Is this because hi healing power is not on a par with Logans ?
TerrorFirmer wrote: That's a staggering amount of material, can't even begin to imagine how it hurts the narrative/cohesion of the film.
TerrorFirmer wrote: » Saw over on Reddit that the Chinese version of the movie has 14 minutes cut out :eek: That's a staggering amount of material, can't even begin to imagine how it hurts the narrative/cohesion of the film. Also, regarding X24, I don't fully understand his 'limited' ability to heal - on one hand it seems that he is deliberately engineered to not be essentially invincible as Weapon X was, giving scientists greater control of him - but on the other, when he's fighting Logan and Laura at the farm, he gets stabbed about 100 times, there's no way he could have sustained that unless he had healing capacity as good as Logan originally did. That element confused me.
will56 wrote: » The lack of other mutants. Am I correct in thinking that the no new mutants is down to the gene therapy that the big bad mentioned ? The Lack of X-men is down to the Westchester incident along with Mutants having been hunted down by transigen (using Caliban) ? And Finally, one bullet killing X-24 ? Is this because hi healing power is not on a par with Logans ?