Sleeper12 wrote: » How would that be so? I would have expected anyone who works with travellers will have an easier time as there is now a legal recognition & the added protection by law. I can see it being harder to discriminate against them but that's not a bad thing
Deleted User wrote: » So employers are queuing up for them, they want them as secretaries and bar staff and waitresses and teachers and so on...it's just that they are genetically lazy? I doubt it.
cursai wrote: I'm talking about organisations that are supposed to treat all people (Irish Citizens to be exact) equally. Such as social welfare or Gardai. Now they are......but aren't. They'll(not all) be the ones discriminating, not the other way round.
end of the road wrote: » yeah. yeah. look, in an ideal world nobody would break the law. but they do. no amount of whining about personal responsibility is going to change the reality. as they being told to not do it doesn't work, the enforcers of the law have to enforce the law.
end of the road wrote: » yeah. yeah. look, in an ideal world nobody would break the law. but they do. no amount of whining about personal responsibility is going to change the reality. as they being told to not do it doesn't work, the enforcers of the law have to enforce the law
Sleeper12 wrote: » You don't seem to understand what being recognised as a ethnic group means. They are still Irish people. They are entitled to the same as you & I. That's it. You need to ignore the nonsense posted here about being given land and such. There will be no confusion in social welfare or the Gardai. If someone is breaking the law they are treated the same. Travellers or settled people. Being an ethnic group they are entitled to protect & preserve their heritage. If their heritage is crime then its still illegal. It's scaremongering to claim otherwise
cursai wrote: You don't seem to understand how things work in actuality. They WILL get extra allowances. In courts, welfare due to political pressures, public view, EU etc etc...COUNT ON IT!!!
Sleeper12 wrote: » Nope. They can now stop people (many posters here) discriminating against them. All they have are equal rights. Many of the comments posters here are identical to the comments when slavery ended in the statesand the blacks weren't even equal there under law. Some is just ignorance and a lot is scaremongering
JamboMac wrote: » http://www.rcsi.ie/index.jsp?p=100&n=110&a=10364 Here's the study and it basically cites the reason for it being the cousin marriages and so on and this come with numerous traveller specific disorders, so if you want the joy of ethnic minority status start breeding with your cousins.
Galwayguy35 wrote: » I did the LC in 1992 and the jobs you would get back then with it need a degree now, if travellers are serious about change then they need to stop dropping out the minute they reach 16.
Omackeral wrote: » However, I think the reputation that travellers have isn't just made up out of nowhere. Where does it come from?
Sleeper12 wrote: » Many of the comments posters here are identical to the comments when slavery ended in the states and the blacks weren't even equal there under law. Some is just ignorance and a lot is scaremongering
Omackeral wrote: » And in an ideal world, the enforcers would be able to enforce it. I'm not arguing with you, I'm saying it's a two way street. It's rich to call it "whining about personal responsibility" when you are just as equally whining about law enforcement! Look, I'm fairly middle of the road (not end of it ) when it comes to social issues. I fcuking DESPISE racists and bigots. If anyone uttered the word n*gger viscously near me, I'd remove myself from their company. If someone casually refers to travellers as knackers, I automatically like them a hell of a lot less. However, I think the reputation that travellers have isn't just made up out of nowhere. Where does it come from?
the_syco wrote: » Pretty much every single job demands LC as minimum. Now, the travellers may call discrimination, but even if they fake the LC they'll still be missing out a large chunk of basic education due to leaving school early. From the "bad ones". Some are law abiding, but they are few and far between. Here's an example in the UK; https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2295989/shocking-moment-gang-of-travellers-wave-wooden-bats-and-hurl-abuse-at-bailiffs-trying-to-evict-them-during-tense-five-hour-stand-off/ The travellers illegally trespassed onto land, and threatened the bailiffs that tried to evict them. If you or I trespassed, the police would arrest us. But the travellers demand that they get treated differently because they say they are the same :pac:
cursai wrote: » I'm rolling my eyes here at the well intentioned naivete. No offence to ye.
Sleeper12 wrote: » That's not quite true. What happened in Apollo House over the Christmas? The trespassers, not a single one of them travellers, were let stay there a full month before being evicted & to date not a single person arrested. Here's the new land league video of them trespassing without being arrested. Again they were moved on a short while later. Posts suggesting different / better laws for travellers is nothing more than scaremongering. What travellers age getting now is equality. How anyone can make out equality is wrong is beyond me.
end of the road wrote: » there is no "well intentioned naivity" apart from in your head.
cursai wrote: They weren't moved because they have media backing and widespread public support and sympathy. And the land leaguers are usually gone the same day. If any groups had large enough numbers they are impossible to move until it is mediated. Some groups always move in large numbers. Go into any hospital where there is a sick relative of theirs. The limit on visitors to a patient is out the window. If someone tries to say this isn't the case in going to roll my eyes again and leave this thread and the sheltered posts to themselves. Lol
cursai wrote: » Well said. Your a gentleman and a scholar. Did you do your leaving cert?
Glenster wrote: » Well done, everyone hates you now.
cursai wrote: » Go into any hospital where there is a sick relative of theirs. The limit on visitors to a patient is out the window. If someone tries to say this isn't the case in going to roll my eyes again and leave this thread and the sheltered posts to themselves. Lol
cursai wrote: » They weren't moved because they have media backing and widespread public support and sympathy. And the land leaguers are usually gone the same day. If any groups had large enough numbers they are impossible to move until it is mediated. Some groups always move in large numbers.Go into any hospital where there is a sick relative of theirs. The limit on visitors to a patient is out the window. If someone tries to say this isn't the case in going to roll my eyes again and leave this thread and the sheltered posts to themselves. Lol
Sofiztikated wrote: » To be fair, this applies to a lot of families. Even my own. A lot of people think the rules only apply to other people.
Deleted User wrote: » Stop the press. Did you say they visit sick relatives in excessive numbers? How come this national scandal hasn't come to light before? You should shake your fist angrily at the sky about it.
cursai wrote: » It's not a national scandal.......
cursai wrote: » Your seriously saying you go to visit family in groups of forty????