bonzodog2 wrote: » Mine is close!
Bandana boy wrote: » Yup checked and they are not the same
readytosnap wrote: » How close?
bonzodog2 wrote: » OK, I got the tape out, both are 27cm, measuring arm to bony stickyout bit on wrist
readytosnap wrote: » have you measured yours? mine are the same, lets have a poll please. everybody, I don't care where you are or what you are doing get your foot out and measure it against your forearm.
DanielODonnell wrote: » After Patrick died it is said there was a battle between the Ui Neill / Airgialla and the Ulaid over who got to keep the body, the body then replicated so they thought they both got the body so it is hard to know if this is a story of legend or a historical fact, maybe they just added in that part.
EndaHonesty wrote: » Do you really find it hard to know whether Patrick's dead body spontaneously replicated or is just a fanciful legend?!! :rolleyes:
DanielODonnell wrote: » I was meaning that it is hard to know whether the complete story is a thing of legend, the story may be true but they added in that part for dramatic effect. It was recorded in the Annals of the Four Masters.
Wossack wrote: » god didnt duplicate the bible, we have johann gutenberg to thank for that
Yourself isit wrote: » Because a digital photo is a collection of pixels and anything can be photographed and be represented by pixels it follows that if you were to run through all the potential pixels in a standard image (of whatever resolution) there is a photo representation for every event in your life, and everybody's lives, from any angle.. Whether you took it or not. Also of course there are photos of people who never existed. Of planets never visited. Or you with famous people. Like the time you went for drinks with Hitler. You and marlyn monroe getting it on. You and marlyn monroe and an alien in a threesome. Anything that can be photographed (which is anything that can imagined) must have some representation digitally. The number of pixel combinations is very very large but finite (and most will be noise. So the number of fully acceptable pictures from the images is much lower). Interesting that it's a finite number.
Anders Shy Aircraft wrote: » No, over 2cm of a difference.
Originally Posted by readytosnap View Post Your foot is the same length as your elbow to your wrist.
EndaHonesty wrote: » No it's not. There is some correlation but they are not the "same length".https://smellyforearmandfeet.wordpress.com/2010/07/29/about-us/
Mountainsandh wrote: » Fact of the day for you male counterparts : After Pregnancy, Women Have Bigger Feet ]
Mountainsandh wrote: » Mine are not. There's between 0.5 to 1 cm difference. Foot is shorter. And that's after 2 pregnancies. Fact of the day for you male counterparts : After Pregnancy, Women Have Bigger Feet http://www.livescience.com/27583-foot-size-pregnancy.html
bonzodog2 wrote: » Do your feet grow, or your forearms shrink?
New Home wrote: » Serious question - have you tried with both feet? Also, as far as I remember, the measurements should be taken from the nook of your elbow to your wrist, not on the outside of your arm.
Mountainsandh wrote: » Ah shtop, I'm short enough already. Last thing I need are shrinking anything ! There was a gentle man in my area who passed away only a few days ago (RIP), he was tiny and shrinking, and locals called him the carrot, as he was growing downwards.
New Home wrote: » That's hilarious! (As long as they saw it as funny too... )
