lawred2 wrote: » Was that the 1920s?
Senor Fancy Pants wrote: » Will they start paying tax and obey the laws of the land now that they have "equality"? Better not hold my breath.
lawred2 wrote: » They always had equality..
Galwayguy35 wrote: I pity any barman trying to deal with rowdy travellers from tomorrow on, look at them sideways and they will shout racism.
maryishere wrote: » Wonder will it mean that 1% of job vacancies in eg McDonalds, Tesco, Dunnes etc will now have to be given to them?
omega man wrote: » The stats on traveller education, employment and health are shocking (assume criminality too). Their 'Ethnicity' plays no part in that. Politicians and the media etc. conveniently ignore this.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Is that shocking because Travellers do not partake, or because there is insufficient resources? You can take a horse to water......
Sleeper12 wrote: » We were the only country in the EU not to recognize them as an ethnic group.People might not be happy about it but 27 different countries came to this belief separately so there must be something to it.
Deleted User wrote: » This may or may not be true. If true that is very understandable as they are Irish Travellers and those 27 countries are presumably not Ireland. Claiming people with surnames like Ward/Mac an Bhaird, Connors/ Ó Conchúir, Joyce/Seoige, McDonagh/Mac Donncha and so forth are not "ethnically" as Irish as the rest of the Irish population has never seemed plausible to me. To me, their socio-economic tradition is that of the spailpín fánach class of itinerant labourers that goes back to the Cromwellian plantations in the 1650s. But their ethnicity has always been Irish.
thomasm wrote: » They are now entitled to services consistent with their culture according to local TD. Stables all around then ...
McLoughlin wrote: » I don't think they are an ethnic group they are just irish people that at one point began to live a different way and travellers refuse to modernise and they want society to pay for them yet they don't want to contribute anything to society. The one issue that concerns me is the travellers believe they have a freedom to go where ever they want so will they have a legal right to trespass ?
judeboy101 wrote: » They can now access bucketloads of European money and now euro law can be used against government if they don't respect all aspects of their culture.
Sam Kade wrote: » Nonsense, they are nomads that came from Europe in the 1500's. If you put a traveller in with a group of 100 settled Irish people the majority of people could point him out.
Richard Hillman wrote: » No they are not. The post you quoted was correct.http://www.thejournal.ie/traveller-community-study-rcsi-3231070-Feb2017/
Deleted User wrote: This may or may not be true. If true that is very understandable as they are Irish Travellers and those 27 countries are presumably not Ireland. Claiming people with surnames like Ward/Mac an Bhaird, Connors/ Ó Conchúir, Joyce/Seoige, McDonagh/Mac Donncha and so forth are not "ethnically" as Irish as the rest of the Irish population has never seemed plausible to me.
Deleted User wrote: To me, their socio-economic tradition is that of the spailpÃn fánach class of itinerant labourers that goes back to the Cromwellian plantations in the 1650s. But their ethnicity has always been Irish.
Spanish Eyes wrote: I still do not know what law, regulation or whatever changes anything to do with ethnic status of Travellers after Kenny's statement. It is a mystery!
Sam Kade wrote: » Can you explain the reason they look so different to settled Irish people if they came from settled Irish people?
Sleeper12 wrote: » They are now protected under any Irish law that protects any ethnic group.