Iused2likebusts wrote: » Coutinho goal
Green&Red wrote: » Nice one, got the Liverpool pick right
Green&Red wrote: » 77, should put me v close to top 100
iroced wrote: » iroced wrote: » 49 (-4) +1 with Alli, Mané & Kane to go. If Spurs click on, it could be a great GW. 77 (-4) +1 with Mané to go. Kane redeemed himself after 2 disappointing outcomes. Makes it hard to drop him for Aguero next GW but that's not today's concern. Let's enjoy his haul as much as my 3rd tennis win in a row :cool:.
iroced wrote: » 49 (-4) +1 with Alli, Mané & Kane to go. If Spurs click on, it could be a great GW.
km79 wrote: » Coutinho down to one bonus is good news Vardy 3 Can 2 Albrighton coutinho 1
Benimar wrote: » If there is any more evidence needed that the bonus system is crap, that's it. 2 BPs for Emre Can??!! The only 2 he deserves is in a rating out of 10!!
iroced wrote: » Didn't see the game so just being the devil's advocate here but from what I read on L'Equipe live text Can was involved in several attacking phases late in the game. If I remember well, key passes are included in the BP system. So along with his assist and assuming he did not miss many passes and/or retrieved a couple of key balls, that makes him a good enough candidate after Vardy, considering both defenses conceded .
Benimar wrote: » That's why the expression is 'lies, damn lies and statistics'! He was possibly Liverpools worst player on the night (and that's an achievement). He was totally anonymous up to 3-0 and makes a couple of forays forward when the game is lost and he gets BPs! It makes no odds as no one has him, but it shows the flaws of a purely stats based system.
