abdulabduler wrote: » Yes, world is extremely overpopulated, humans are destroying this planet.
Shemale wrote: » Because single mothers allowance in Ireland is the best career choice in Europe?
ZeroThreat wrote: » I feel your pain, even trojan magnums feel tight on my meatpole.
Starscream25 wrote: » I want them because they'll make me happy, I want to be a dad. I have a paternal instinct in me, can't wait to clean all that poop up and see them grow. From day 1 will be training him/her to be a professional footballer, it's an investment really.should be able to retire when I'm 50 once he/she breaks into a premier league team ill be sorted.
abdulabduler wrote: » We are straining mothers earth's resources, Ireland is not overpopulated but almost every other European country is, prime example England.
Samsgirl wrote: » For the parent and child parking spaces obviously!!
Finnley Zealous Candlestick wrote: » It's not all about the money (or lack of)...We also do it so we can look down on childless couples.... ..... And wonder why they don't want the joy that getting called "daddy" brings. For all the negatives, that outweighs them !
batistuta9 wrote: » For some it's part of a predetermined plan that they think is the only way to live life & you have to follow it. College - job - partner - marriage - house - kids. Others I think have kids to give them some sort of 'meaning' in their life.
wakka12 wrote: » As far as I can see the British government is successfully providing its densely populated little nation with enough food ,water, heating, clothing, electricity, education and healthcare (within reason). Japan seems to be providing its citizens with extremely high quality of life despite the incredibly high population desnity.While one of the least populated countries on earth, Suriname has a poverty rate of nearly 50%. Other relatively poor but extremely sparsely populated countries include mongolia and Namibia. On the flip side, another two countries with very sparse population density but high quality of life include iceland and australia. Greenland is another example with very average quality of life. Clearly there is very little correlation between quality of life and population density Over population, in numerical terms is a complete myth. Over population = not having enough resources to sustain a population. NOT the number of people residing in an area. Its very seldom that a place is literally over populated, as in its so densely packed that the population cant all seem to fit/live in the place. For example hong kong. England, Netherlands, Ireland nor anywhere in Europe are in any way 'over populated'
Richard Hillman wrote: » I find it strange for men but can understand women because it's part of their biological make up. Men just want to mate and protect their children if they come. Women want to actually have the child part. I can't say I have any ambitions to have children and I am reaching the point of no return in terms of finding a partner to do it. Unless I become Mick Jagger and trade a new one in every 10 years.
MadDog76 wrote: » You don't think men have a biological urge to continue their lineage through having children?
Surprisingly, given how fundamental the question might seem to the perpetuation of the human species, the reasons for why some women want children and others don't remain fuzzy. Few scientists have actually studied women’s so-called biological drive to reproduce, so no universal explanation has emerged in the literature. Some attribute it to basic genetic variety; some women are into kids, some aren’t. But with relatively few women falling into the “aren’t” category, the question of why these few women aren’t interested in kids becomes even more interesting. The only consistent biological theory is that women with no desire to parent either have a high testosterone level or were exposed to above-average testosterone in the womb. Many scientists believe the seemingly biological drive some women feel isn’t triggered by biology, so much as culture—combined with a fertility deadline. Not only is having children more socially acceptable, says evolutionary biologist David Barash, author of Strange Bedfellows: The Surprising Connection Between Sex, Evolution and Monogamy, but for many, as a life goal, it represents a source of happiness and belonging in the same way that attending college or pursuing a career might. Evolution has bestowed upon women a desire for sex and the equipment to have a baby; from here, free will steps in.
batistuta9 wrote: For some it's part of a predetermined plan that they think is the only way to live life & you have to follow it. College - job - partner - marriage - house - kids.
batistuta9 wrote: Others I think have kids to give them some sort of 'meaning' in their life.
DanielODonnell wrote: » Children make me miserable plus I don't want to add to the human population as I think we need to eventually die out.
DanielODonnell wrote: » I remember reading a comment on here a long time ago that said that your forefathers have been passing down the dna for centuries and you don't want to be the man who stops it but that is not the case because as long as you have siblings who have children then the dna is still passed on. Children make me miserable plus I don't want to add to the human population as I think we need to eventually die out.
Richard Hillman wrote: » I find it strange for men but can understand women because it's part of their biological make up. Men just want to mate and protect their children if they come. Women want to actually have the child part.
abdulabduler wrote: » Ireland has(still?) the highest birth rates in European Union. I was thinking why would anyone want to have children. Seems to me like a self inflicted torture. Screaming, shouting pooping, huge responsibility for absolute minimum of 18 years.