nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

2016-17 UEFA Champions League

citytillidie

Yes it is that time again

Draw for 1st and 2nd Qualifying Rounds are on Monday at 11am.

1st Round
Seeds
The New Saints (WAL)
Valletta FC (MLT)
Flora Tallinn (EST)
FC Santa Coloma (AND)

Unseeded
B36 Torshavn (FAR)
Lincoln Red Imps (GIB)
Alashkert FC (ARM)
Tre Penne (SMA)

2nd Round
Seeds
FC Salzburg (AUT)
Celtic FC (SCO)
APOEL Nicosia (CYP)
BATE Borisov (BLS)
Legia Warsaw(POL)
Dinamo Zargreb (CRO)
Ludogorets Razgrad (BUL)
FC København (DEN)
Garabag Agdam (AZB)
Rosenborg BK (NOR)
FK Astana (KAZ)
Sheriff Tiraspol (MOL)
Red Star Belgrade (SRB)
Dinamo Tbilisi (GEO)
FH Hafnarfjardar (ISL)
AS Trencín (SVK)
Winners of match with The New Saints

Unseeded
F91 Dudelange (LUX)
Zalgiris Vilnius (LIT)
Hapoel Beer-Sheva (ISR)
Olimpija Ljubljana (SLO)
Winners of match with Valletta FC
Vardar Skopje (MAC)
IFK Norrköping (SWE)
Ferencváros (HUN)
Crusaders Belfast (NIR)
Winners of game with Flora Tallinn
Zrinjski Mostar (BOS)
Winners of game with FC Santa Coloma
Dundalk (IRL)
Mladost Podgorica (MON)
SJK Seinäjoki (FIN)
Partizani Tirana (ALB)* TBC
FK Liepaja (LAT)

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Johner

This isn't surprising to anyone that has watched Monaco this season, quality team.

GreNoLi

Attacking full backs and high vertical passing endangering city's champions league sojourn, monaco looking sexy.

klose

That front 3 playing off falcao are a joy to watch.

blueser

GreNoLi wrote: »

Justice.

elefant

TheCitizen wrote: »

It was a penalty the goalie came out and obstructed him. Anyone on this thread saying otherwise are fans of other EPL sides and don't like Man City or simply haven't a clue about football.

So far we've three posters who think it was a penalty.

Two guys names TheCitizen and Blueser, and Andersonisgod.

I don't think it's everyone else being biased...

LuckyGent88

Some break once again. Silva is so comfortable in possession

blueser

Tyson Fury wrote: »

Hopefully this will be the end of gwuardiola

Why so?

martyos121

Just to clear it up once and for all since some here are adamant the goal should've been ruled out, proof that Sterling was onside:

C5Nzhr1WQAADEA6?format=jpg&name=medium

The camera angle is deceiving because it's not a straight on view from the side, the ball is pretty much dead level with Sterling when it's played if not a bit ahead of him, so it's a fair goal.

Jayop

blueser wrote: »

Why so?

Spoofer Bill

sReq | uTeK

Best champions league game I've watched this year. Fantastic for the neutral.

End to end

GreNoLi

Very satisfying half.

niallo27

elefant wrote: »

So far we've three posters who think it was a penalty.

Two guys names TheCitizen and Blueser, and Andersonisgod.

I don't think it's everyone else being biased...

If the keeper does get a touch it's not a penalty but if he doesn't I think it is. Augero doesn't have to hurdle him.

tayto lover

Cracking match. Very enjoyable for the neutral.

Mr.Nice Guy

Great advert for Ligue 1. A league that is often disrespected.

Unearthly

Were they booing the ref?

martyos121

Mr.Nice Guy wrote: »

Great advert for Ligue 1. A league that is often disrespected.

They have three great teams now, I'm really looking forward to seeing Nice in the CL next season as long as they aren't raided in the summer by the bigger clubs.

~Rebel~

martyos121 wrote: »

Just to clear it up once and for all since some here are adamant the goal should've been ruled out, proof that Sterling was onside:

The camera angle is deceiving because it's not a straight on view from the side, the ball is pretty much dead level with Sterling when it's played if not a bit ahead of him, so it's a fair goal.

Still verrrry close, but on reflection I can't say I'd have a problem with it being given though. It's close enough that i'd like the benefit of the doubt to go to the attackers (even though it seldom does)

TheCitizen

elefant wrote: »

So far we've three posters who think it was a penalty.

Two guys names TheCitizen and Blueser, and Andersonisgod.

I don't think it's everyone else being biased...

I'm not a Man City fan. That was a penalty, take off whatever coloured specs you're wearing. A ridiculous decision.

Monaco are as serious outfit, could be dark horses this season. That has nothing to do with the referee's error in not awarding a penalty to Man City.

GreNoLi

blueser wrote: »

?

Only joshing, city in trouble though, a chasm in midfield and 2 Argentinean headless chickens at the back.

Jayop

IMO if you need more than 3 replays to prove if a goal was onside then it was onside.

LuckyGent88

Game is certainly living up to expectations. Great pace to it. City certainly the better team for the first half hour and took a deserved lead but Monaco have come back brilliantly even if it's taken some horrendous defending from city.

Superb call for the non-penalty. Keeper got a knick on the ball first. Maybe a tad harsh giving Aguero a yellow for diving though in my mind.

Still more goals to come in this. I'll say 3-3

Andersonisgod

sReq | uTeK wrote: »

Pep is just making this city team so beatable playing Tiki taka when they can clearly not do it

This City side is so far ahead in it's development path than where anybody probably thought they'd be. This is a fantastic Monaco side and their matching them attack for attack (something that no other side in England could probably do) and they sit 2nd in the league, all the while carrying some players who are probably past their best or just not up to the level you need. It's incredible that anyone would write off City like this after that half of football.

martyos121

~Rebel~ wrote: »

I wouldn't say that's 'proof'. It shows it's certainly very close, but we knew that...

On reflection I can't say I'd have a problem with it being given though. It's close enough that i'd like the benefit of the doubt to go to the attackers (even though it seldom does)

It is proof though. The ball is laterally closer or at least as close to the six yard line as Sterling. Level is onside too, the forward gets the benefit of the doubt. I don't see a proper argument for it being offside tbh.

~Rebel~

martyos121 wrote: »

It is proof though. The ball is laterally closer or at least as close to the six yard line as Sterling. Level is onside too, the forward gets the benefit of the doubt. I don't see a proper argument for it being offside tbh.

yeah, i've reassessed, and did a sneaky ninja edit - you got me before i hit save it looks like though

martyos121

~Rebel~ wrote: »

yeah, i've reassessed, and did a sneaky ninja edit - you got me before i hit save it looks like though

Evens out my "moneyball" blunder to be fair. :pac:

niallo27

Just watched it again it's a penalty for me. He cleared him out. Shocking to book him.

GreNoLi

City goal was onside and I also thought it was a peno.

CalamariFritti

Aguero lucky not to be sent off for that dive

No City fan but how was that not a peno?

corny

TV3. 30 seconds chat then back to the adds.

blueser

At least the Sterling goal has been cleared up. Now, if we can just erase our (non) defending!