rachb wrote: » Probably because the people who cross the picket line are actually the ones and have been the ones paying the strikers wages by shopping in their store. But I'm sure they forget that now that they are striking.
tomwaterford wrote: » Oh....this old shte I hear the same shte at times in my job......what do people think....if it wasnt for them/place im working. That i wouldnt be working somewhere else earning money??
rachb wrote: » Well it's not rocket science really.... Without the customers , the company wouldn't still be here and the workers striking wouldn't have jobs in Tesco.
tomwaterford wrote: » But theyd have jobs somewhere else?? Your crossing picket in a rather weak attempt to juatify it as its paying their wages (they dont be paid when on strike if i had to guess) By all means.....ignore the pickets and people looking out for themselves......but dont whinge about poor/bare minimum service you recive from them in the future?
seamus wrote: » Solidarity with what? So you support any strike, regardless of what it's about?
ThisRegard wrote: » It's not just the money that's the issue, it's their totally inflexible work practices, who's slack has to be picked up by other employees. They don't have overwhelming support within the company and the nonsense of them going in, filling up trollies and abandoning them at the checkout only further antagonises relationships within the store, it's their colleagues who then have to sort that out.
ThisRegard wrote: » Why should you have solidarity with something you're not involved in or don't agree with? Pretty much every private company has to continuously adapt to the market they operate in, the vast majority of employees in a company realise this and will work with them, their success is mutually beneficial.
ThisRegard wrote: » Like i said, it's their refusal to be flexible beyond their contracts from before 1996. Before the redundancy roll out you had for example butchers insisting they work the early hours and finish early in stores that didn't even have butchers anymore. Why would you want them working for you?
Arghus wrote: » The term "starter job" is such a condescending phrase.
Phoebas wrote: » There was a Tesco picket at the entrance to Artane Shopping Centre today. Not at the entrance to the Tesco inside the centre, but at the entrance to the whole shopping centre - which has another 15 retail businesses, all of whom aren't anything to do with the dispute, but will have been effected by the picket. Its a bad show by the Tesco strikers to be damaging the livelihoods of people not party to the dispute.
LordSutch wrote: » Should 250 disgruntled Tesco employees be allowed to hold everybody to ransom? Tesco do a great job, we'd be lost without them.
Mrs OBumble wrote: » €14 per hour is huge money for what's basically unskilled work. And it's more than their post 96 colleagues - doing the same job - are on. Yes retail wages are low: thats why most people pull finger, study and get into either management or another industry. Starter jobs should not be seen as jobs for life.
pauliebdub wrote: » I'd have no problem crossing a picket line - it does depend on what the strike was about though. I'm surprised that a company like Tesco recognises unions considering that they don't have to and few retailers do. I've never been a member of a union and have very little time for them.
rachb wrote: » No I won't. I've already crossed it and will continue to do as I do my shopping weekly in Tesco. I was already thanked in store by a worker for shopping this week even with the strike. The workers "looking out for themselves" have been offered a fair package for their basically unskilled jobs, that they have been doing since pre 96, so I won't feel any remorse for doing so.
end of the road wrote: » one who has any bit of decentsy does not cross a picket whether they agree or disagree with a strike.
ShaneU wrote: » The grounds of Artane Castle, including the car park are Tesco property, they're not allowed picket in it. Do you think they would stand out in the cold all day if they were allowed in the centre? use your head.
Arghus wrote: » I believe that Tesco won't allow pickets at the enterance to the store, so the location they picked was as close as they were permitted to get.
tomwaterford wrote: » I can never fathom how people that do this...think its a good idea Theyll have to work/try live arpund the people theyve walked past??
SeanW wrote: » No, just go somewhere else.The Tesco workers aren't like the public sector waestrels - they're in a business where they have to compete with other shops (unlike the PS, who work in State monopolies and can bring entire sectors of the country/economy to a halt). With private companies like Tesco, you can just go to another store. Also given how rare Private Sector strikes are relative to public sector, you have to suspect the company must have been a special kind of dick to push their workers to that point. All you're being asked to do is go to another shop ... it's not a Herculean feat.
Delacent wrote: » The deal offered by tesco was said to have been quite good, but as usual the union thought they'd try and squeeze more. It backfired and they're now out on strike. Btw, Tesco is a public company and mostly owned by pension funds of ordinary people - the media will never explain that as it doesn't paint the nasty "big business" picture they like to portray.
mariaalice wrote: » And apparently there are only 250 staff involved Tesco are stupid on this one in general they are very good to work for.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Dont forget the CEOs wages were 4.6 million last year.
Jawgap wrote: » So you're begrudging a guy who went to a Poly, then worked his way from an entry level position up through Unilever to head up Tesco his salary..... .....gotta love Ireland - instead of pointing out what getting an education and applying yourself in a job can bring, we get commentary about the salary :rolleyes:
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Well actually thats tescos fault. They wont allow the unions to picket the storefronts. And also in the two tescos I have passed by they are oficially encouraging the public not to boycott other businesses.
Jawgap wrote: » You want to know why......here's why...... I worked in the PS up until recently and I remember vitriol poured on PS workers for striking - so it can hardly be surprising that people are less inclined towards respecting picket lines compared to previously? Plus, where are people supposed to shop? Dunne's have had their issues with staff and zero hours contracts (never mind how they continue to treat suppliers)......convenience stores are over-priced......Aldi and Lidl are non-union. oh, and by the way the current round of industrial unrest really started with the Luas workers and their private sector employer caving to their demands. ....and in this instance I don't know why there is such sympathy for the Tesco workers - they went to the WRC, they got a ruling and they still spat their dummy - I'm guessing if an employer followed a similar tack they'd be rightly filleted for it.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Nope I'm highlighting that Tesco is a highly profitable company that has no problem giving its senior management high wages.
Phoebas wrote: » Saying that it's Tesco's fault is a bit of a cop out. The strikers are responsible for where they mount their pickets - no one put a gun to their heads. And the vast majority of customers of the shopping centre I mentioned arrive by car, so there isn't any opportunity for Tesco strikers to encourage them not to boycott other businesses. They can't just stop for a chat at the roundabout at the entrance to the shopping centre. Its perfectly ok to argue that the collateral damage to other businesses is a price worth paying, but at least lets not try to pass the responsibility off to someone else.