eeguy wrote: » They were offered redundancy last year of 5 weeks wages per year uncapped, so a touch under 3k per year worked. Since most of them have been there over 20 years (pre-96) it's upwards of 55k or so per person. Honestly it's not bad for a someone on 26k per year, working on tills or stacking shelves and who could probably get another job easy enough with all that experience. 70% of them took the redundancy, but the rest are on strike over new changes to their contracts.http://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/over-70-of-long-serving-tesco-staff-accept-redundancy-offer-1.2618114
seamus wrote: » Solidarity with what? So you support any strike, regardless of what it's about?
punisher5112 wrote: » The ones that are left are the younger ones from most of I know. The ones that snapped up 1st offer did so due to age and being closer to retirement anyway so worked out OK. It will be extremely difficult for most that are left to get another job. Its not big money at all anyway.If you think working in a shop is easy then you obviously have never done so yourself.
Banana Republican wrote: » You'd swear the long term staff were on huge money. They earn 14 euro an hour ffs how can that be considered good money?? . Tesco are a disgrace but they aren't the only ones. This race to the bottom is going to grind this country to a complete standstill if allowed continue. Also shame on anyone passing the picket line.
seamus wrote: » I don't see the issue crossing a picket? People are entitled to strike. I'm under no obligation to support that strike. What's the issue here?
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » What money are the pre 96 staff on ?
Grueller wrote: » I hope you never need to use recourse to strike in a dispute with an employer. What has happened to us as a people? No solidarity at all.
Grueller wrote: » Read what punisher5112 said above. Far better worded than I could have. Companies with massive profits crabbing about €14 p/h. Come on like.
ThisRegard wrote: » It's not just the money that's the issue, it's their totally inflexible work practices, who's slack has to be picked up by other employees. They don't have overwhelming support within the company and the nonsense of them going in, filling up trollies and abandoning them at the checkout only further antagonises relationships within the store, it's their colleagues who then have to sort that out. Why should you have solidarity with something you're not involved in or don't agree with? Pretty much every private company has to continuously adapt to the market they operate in, the vast majority of employees in a company realise this and will work with them, their success is mutually beneficial. Like i said, it's their refusal to be flexible beyond their contracts from before 1996. Before the redundancy roll out you had for example butchers insisting they work the early hours and finish early in stores that didn't even have butchers anymore. Why would you want them working for you?
punisher5112 wrote: » I call bull. That I don't believe for a second.
Thargor wrote: » Ive been all over Wicklow and Dublin today and I saw several Tesco protests. The only really empty carpark was Bray, the rest of them looked pretty busy tbh, some like Glenageary outright packed. Tbh whatever you think of unions and whatnot I dont think any Tesco employee is living the highlife and the company could generally be described as a scummy operation especially the stories you hear about their attitude to suppliers, I doubt their attitute to staff is much better. Its kind of shocking so many people would just drive past a picket like that, Im not from any union family and Im not in one myself but Id never cross a picket like that especially for a bit of Sunday shopping, felt a bit disappointing tbh. Do people just not give a fcuk?
mariaalice wrote: » And apparently there are only 250 staff involved Tesco are stupid on this one in general they are very good to work for.
Delacent wrote: » No they're not - you have to understand the underhand tactics of unions. They get a better deal for 250, then they insist on same deal for the other 14,500. Civil service unions are masters at this Btw - guess who really pays?? Yep, the consumer.
elperello wrote: » I wouldn't pass a picket under any circumstances. Some things are sacred.
Mrs OBumble wrote: » €14 per hour is huge money for what's basically unskilled work. And it's more than their post 96 colleagues - doing the same job - are on. Yes retail wages are low: thats why most people pull finger, study and get into either management or another industry. Starter jobs should not be seen as jobs for life.
gobo99 wrote: » The €105,000 figure is an absolute lie from tesco of which there's no proof.
ThisRegard wrote: » So tell us why you're so sure it's a lie when simple mathematics leads to the contrary?
gobo99 wrote: » Show me figures then that haven't been doctored by tesco...
ThisRegard wrote: » So you'll ignore simple maths. Tell us why it, us, the LC and Tesco are all wrong?
gobo99 wrote: » Show me where you're getting these figures...
tomwaterford wrote: » I know people whove not spoken to some of their neighbours in nearly 30 years (longer than im alive) over 1 crossing a picket If you wish to laugh at peoples concerns and reasons their on strike...by all means....just dont complain when you get the absolute bare minimum of service at any establishment......you clearly dont care about them....why should they care about you??