bodice ripper wrote: » Sharing living expenses isn't paying for things for someone else. The clue is in the word sharing...
Johnboner wrote: So you are paying for her part as well, interpret it however you want, it doesn't change the meaning.
Johnboner wrote: » So tell me when you invite a girl for a date who pays? Don't tell me what you would do, tell me what's the ''social norm''
Cameo wrote: » I don't see your point - expressing concerns about something means saying everyone should be wrapped in bubble wrap? Man, this has struck a nerve for you. What has that got to do with paying for sex?
ScumLord wrote: » I'd be in favour of legalisation because it's way worse when it's illegal.
Johnboner wrote: » So you are paying for her part as well, interpret it however you want, it doesn't change the meaning.
Johnboner wrote: » Yes, it means exactly that.
Berserker wrote: » I've often wondered what the workers themselves, the people who advertised on this site, for example, would say to that. It may be safer but they are going to be openly known as escorts, which could bring problems in itself and their earnings are going to take a nose-dive, due to tax etc. I have a very dim view of the whole area of prostitution from my time in Amsterdam. Thought it offered nothing positive to what is a beautiful city.
bodice ripper wrote: » Also, telling that you went with "her" there, since I did say I have had boyfriends as well...
Cameo wrote: » Yup. Tis pretty clear what his agenda is.
Johnboner wrote: » What is in your opinion my agenda? I just forgot to put gf/bf.
jimmynokia wrote: » You would have to presume females would be charged if caught with a male escort..Because it happens..
Cameo wrote: » An anti women one.
Johnboner wrote: » True and its hilarious because the woman doesn't get punished. The law is campaigned by extreme feminists who should be removed from society as it is completely unfair, they go around spreading their fake news and causing chaos and unfair treatment everywhere while hiding behind feminism. But the law is not there yet so you can buy sex all you want just do it now before it will become illegal due to the pressure from ''turn off the red light'' movement.
Cameo wrote: » I agree (although removed from society?) - the people who should be asked their opinion are the prostitutes themselves - and plenty are getting on fine, but there are those who aren't.
Donald Trump wrote: 300 quid for a 22 year old escort
Johnboner wrote: » Everyone that goes to prostitutes gets STD 100% of the time. And where did you get that it's illegal to go to prostitutes? It is LEGAL to pay for sex in Ireland so you can freely go to all the escorts you want without breaking the law. Another misinformed person spreading false information.
professore wrote: » Not anymore it isn't. It's now illegal to purchase but not sell sex.http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/sexual-offences-bill-criminalising-purchase-of-sex-passed-in-dáil-1.2968097
Johnboner wrote: » I cannot find any real info about it outside the article
professore wrote: » Google it. It's the sexual offences bill about consent. This was tacked onto it. Do you think the Irish Times just made it up? If you do then you've got worse problems my friend
Cartouche wrote: » I have never really understood why prostitution is illegal. Surely all the arguments against it would be better and safer if it was completely legal
OU812 wrote: » Once both parties are consenting, I've no problems with it. Not sure I'd feel the same way if it was my daughter though...