serfboard wrote: » Thanks for posting this. Once again, Shane Ross comes across like a complete bollocks.
marno21 wrote: » Parliamentary question on greenways in Dublin from today: https://www.kildarestreet.com/debates/?id=2017-06-28a.411
marno21 wrote: » https://irl.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/publicpurchase_frameset.asp?PID=111327&B=ETENDERS_SIMPLE&PS=1&PP=ctm/Supplier/publictenders Tender out today for construction of 3.5km of Carlingford Lough greenway.
Please note our portal www.newrymournedown.org/procurement is not part of or subject to www.e-tenders.ie but they kindly allow us to publish this notice and promote this project.
Over 1,500 used Athlone greenway extension on one day The Athlone to Mullingar greenway has been hailed as a major success story and an example for other greenway projects to follow by Transport Minister Shane Ross. "This is actually achieving everything we want to see from greenways," said Minister Ross on Friday last. "It's attracting new people to visit the area, it's providing an amenity for local people to cycle on, and it's also making it easier and safer for people to cycle to work and school."
marno21 wrote: » Tender has gone out for construction of a greenway in Co. Leitrim.https://irl.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/publicpurchase_frameset.asp?PID=110723&B=ETENDERS_SIMPLE&PS=1&PP=ctm/Supplier/publictenders
There was uproar among the farming community when it was originally proposed to bring a from Ballinasloe to Galway through farmland, dissecting farm holdings along the way. This proposal was eventually shelved following major opposition from farmers and the IFA.
loyatemu wrote: » well we have the route along the Grand Canal and planning is well advanced for a similar route on the north quays. The route along the coast from Sutton to Clontarf is nearly complete too though sadly the planned route along the Dodder has been put on the long finger.
yer man! wrote: » I wonder if there's any appetite to build some cycle super highways here like they are in London. Seems like such a good option in the cities.https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/cycling/routes-and-maps/cycle-superhighways
Deedsie wrote: » What would the difference in cost be between a crushed stone cycle track v tarmac cycle track plus upkeep?
Based on a whole life comparison, unbound surfaces [limestone, gravel] are at least 50% more expensive than bound surfaces [tarmac, etc.]. However, there are many factors that can accelerate the rate of wear on an unbound path, which would make the cost difference even greater.Cycle Path Surface Options
Sustrans initially surfaced many off-road sections of the National Cycle Network with unbound limestone or granite dust surfaces, which were considered most economic and more environmentally friendly at the time. Experience over the last 15-20 years or so has shown however that already significant path sections have suffered erosion, rutting, ponding or other damage that make these paths very unattractive and unusable in very wet weather conditions. Annual maintenance requirements for unbound surfaces are generally higher than for bound surfaces.
MJohnston wrote: » Crushed stone can be uneven and a bit dodgy for road or hybrid bikes, Sams probably referring to how likely it will be to cause a few cycling injuries.
Sam Russell wrote: » Crushed stone does not show the blood left by cyclists who fall off.
Carawaystick wrote: » The Deise Greenway has opened from Kilmacthomas to Dungarvan This gem of a post from the waterford city forum caught my eye