hullaballoo wrote: » There's a slightly pedantic point to be made, so I'll make it. Under the old regime, the liquidator had to make the s. 150 application between 3-5 months after he made his s. 56 report to the ODCE. Under the new Act, the liquidator has 2 months from the date on which the Director of Corporate Enforcement has notified the liquidator that the Director has not relieved the liquidator
hullaballoo wrote: » Yeah, the liquidator has to wait for the letter then has 2 months to bring s. 819 (not s. 820!!!) application. There is no other period. Bear in mind that the Court has inherent jurisdiction to extend statutory limitation periods notwithstanding that the 2014 Act purports to vest that power solely in the Director of Corporate Enforcement. The liquidator always had to wait for the letter but as above, previously that created a quirk where the liquidator submitted his report and the 3-5 month period expired before the ODCE got back to them. Thus, the liquidator had to apply for the s. 56 (2) extension of time even though it was the Director's fault.
thestar wrote: » I have spoken to a person who has done these exams before. 5 questions and 5 pages per question they wrote in 3 hours.. i can't understand how people are capable of getting so much information written down. 25 pages just seems to me to be impossible to do?
Redo91 wrote: » Ya sorry I got confused there. S 820 gives the liquidator power to bring a restriction order isn't it?
What Section gives the court the jurisdiction to do that?
odwyer94 wrote: » Does anyone know of/have any predictions for Tort?
the great communicator wrote: » I went to that constitutional lecture in UCD but I'm not an intelligent man and I've lost my notes so here's the cases I remember. bederev v ireland - non delegation doctrine waxy o'connor's ltd v ??? - strict liability NHV v minister for j - right to livelihood Gilchrist v rogers - admin of justice in public Doyle v ??? - solicitor present during detention (think this was 2017 so probably didn't have time to put in on exam) Kerins case - ??? topic the charity one Well worth the entrance fee
XxMCRxBabyxX wrote: » In Company, do all ROT clauses have to be registered now or is it still 2 do (Simple and All Sums Due) and 2 don't (Proceeds of Sale and Aggregation)? Manual is saying one thing and the lecturer is saying another!
annmc882 wrote: » As a person that hasn't a clue but should know, can I ask what is the lecture ye speak of, how often is it on and any idea where I'd get info for the next one? any lnfo or links would be really appreciated
annmc882 wrote: » I have my thoughts but afraid to say in case I put people wrong
Pickpocket wrote: » I believe it's a lecture that's given once a year by the person that writes the constitutional exam. The line of thinking is that his 'key cases' every year are worth knowing.
20029422 wrote: » has panic started to kick in for anyone else the last two days have loads of notes written but nothing learned.I'm also not going near my criminal and contract notes till the 13 days between my first two exams.is this a disastrous plan??
Dsalmon91 wrote: » Just wondering has anyone received correspondence from the Law Society outlining the exam info and candidates exam number. I know in application receipt they said these details would be sent out approximately 2 weeks before the start of the exams but I haven't received anything yet.
20029422 wrote: » offer acceptance consideration estoppel intention to create formal requirements privity capacity terms exclusion clauses consumer protection & sale mistake duress undue influence uncon bargain discharge of obligations misrep remedies I know this seems like a lot but I in no way know these but I have notes on them all and after sitting the last exam and failing I'm not skipping much because you need enough topics to answer two papers really for contract
