Autosport wrote: » So I ended up getting a policy with Avivia through the AA, I rang them and I managed to get a better quote with them so I'm insured for another year but Axa didn't want my custom anymore
johndaman66 wrote: » cover with paylessdirect.ie
arkrow wrote: » Never came across them before...not even going through 7 pages of google results...
Happyilylost wrote: Age 33-male Car Type: 00 Nissan Almera No Claims, No Points. 2015: euro407 2016: 607euro 2017: 837euro with Axa now through AA.
Happyilylost wrote: Anyone with a 15+ year old car get any decent quote lately? Or can anyone offer any advice on a company? Most won't quote online any that do is over my renewal. Any help would be great.
DvB wrote: » Managed to finally get my quote down to something resembling reasonable (relatively anyway) through Allianz, ended up at €574 fully comp incl. their breakdown cover & bonus protection Bizarre to think 2 years ago I paid €306 for essentially the same policy & this time around had the vast majority of the usual suspects quote me over €1k , one even quoted me €1700... dreading to see whats going to happen next year, I can fully understand why many now take the chance of driving uninsured, its a complete rip off & seriously needs looking into.
H3llR4iser wrote: » Bizarre? In three years I went from 540 to 700 to ~960, same car (Alfa 159 1.9 petrol), no claims, more NCB, no penalty points; And those are the lowest possible figures - last October most companies flat out refused to quote me, and some came up with ~2000 euro premiums. If anything, this thread makes a big case for the idea that premium quotes are dished out more or less randomly, hoping that people would just pay up and shut up.
Rolan4 wrote: » my Latvia
barry181091 wrote: » Male. Age: 25 NCB: None. License: Full (Just received). So I am getting quotes on general 1.2/1.4 cars for anywhere from 2800-4000. Can anyone in the know tell me why it is that the more named drivers I add to my policy (Up to 3 I find), the more the premium is reduced!? Seems mad!?
givyjoe wrote: » The general idea is that named drivers mean you are using the car less, therefore a lower risk of YOU crashing.
barry181091 wrote: » givyjoe wrote: » The general idea is that named drivers mean you are using the car less, therefore a lower risk of YOU crashing. That is what I was expecting but in reality that is false, unless the policy states that named drivers must drive for X time. Great for me though :D
TeaBagMania wrote: » Yep, makes absolutely no sense, you could add your parents and your grand parents as named drives even though they would never drive the car... mad indeed
givyjoe wrote: » Do they have to be alive ?
johndaman66 wrote: » I really wouldn't agree with that logic. If anything I would say there is an overall higher risk of an accident if there is more people driving the same car. Remember the same insurance company will have to make a payout if any of the named drivers have an accident with the car. Not too long ago it would have generally cost more to name someone on a policy, probably still is the case with some providers............ go figure. If I had to hazard a guess I would think the logic is that the named driver might be more inclined to get a quote from the same company come their renewal time, brings in more new business.
cplwhisper wrote: » All continent Eu licences are more than Irish licences for all insurance companies but a rare few. Untraceable penalty points are main loss of revenue for insurers thus It gets all drivers to change so to eliviate the risk. Rates for IRL licence policies are up min 25% on the premium you paid last year