KingBrian2 wrote: » They would claim it is her responsibility since allegedly the police vote for the far right. Her actions are therefore contributing to the unrest in the country. Undeniably their is an element of outsiders causing this i reckon ISIS or other subversive groups are staging this violent uprisings.
Mrs OBumble wrote: » But its not, because the police have decided not to charge their member be cause it was "an accident" sic.
Banana Republican wrote: » Then people should organise massive peaceful protests in response that's how democracy works in western society. Violence isn't the answer. Hard working shop owners, car owners etc.. are having their property destroyed by these p ric ks.
Banana Republican wrote: » So it's "undeniable" is it? Come on this is complete and utter scumbag thuggery from these idiots. It's not organised by ISIS or anyone else that's pure fantasy stuff.
IvyTheTerrible wrote: » There WERE big peaceful protests but some violent elements hijacked them. The violence didn't start straightaway. It's 10 days since the incident happened.
KingBrian2 wrote: » The peaceful protests don't get the attention. Gandhi and Mother Theresa took a long time to get their message across.
Grayson wrote: » Were they in ISIS as well?
KingBrian2 wrote: » ISIS did say they want to infiltrate the west and cause chaos now this is all exaggeration we know that we also know ISIS sleeper agents and Jihadi's are concentrating on attacking Europe & America and stop Muslims, Jews & Christians of Europe from living and working side by side.
KingBrian2 wrote: » Agreed if they did what they are being accused of. Taking your action on the entire police force for the actions of one or a number of officers is taking the situation to extreme. Enter politics but to engage in wanton violence automatically disqualifies you. What did the business owners and fellow French citizens do to have to experience this rioters behaviour.
wakka12 wrote: » Generally Im against it but Im in support of these protests/riots in this case. Its astounding than a man capable of that was hired and placed in a position where he is supposed to keep the public safe. Very justified in this case imo
KingBrian2 wrote: » Your in favour of the rioting. I don't know how any one can be in favour of people rioting. The situation is eerily similar to the west bank and now we have posters MightyMandarin comparing Trump & Geert Wilders to ISIS who have publicly beheaded people and practice forced marriages. The solution would be to shut down the Front National and prescribe it a terrorist organisation.
Banana Republican wrote: » It isnt a "few violent protesters". Watch the online videos it's hundreds of scumbags out to cause criminal damage and attacking the police. There is zero excuse for that. They are scum.
eerily ee·rie or ee·ry (îr′ē) adj. ee·ri·er, ee·ri·est 1. Absolutely nothing like. 2. So distantly related as to be impossible to compare to. [Middle English eri, distant, from Old English earg, opposite.]
wakka12 wrote: » yeh sometimes I am in support of riots, often with these things nobody listens and no change will come about unless violence is used.
DredFX wrote: » From the UK Independent, since the Internet has apparently picked an apt time to have dodgy links: Police brutality, met with brutality. The usual song and dance.
suicide_circus wrote: » This policeman is literally a sodomite.
IvyTheTerrible wrote: » The riots are because a cop raped a guy with his baton, and when questioned said the the guys pants fell down in the scuffle and his baton " accidentally" penetrated him and caused a 4 inch tear. Now whatever you think about immigration into France, I think that counts as a problem of policing.
Lovely Bloke wrote: » Protests are fine, and god knows a young lad having a truncheon shoved up his jacksie is reason enough to take to the streets to protest against police brutality, but when they become criminal damage of people's livelihoods then they become the actions of a scumbag mob. .
sbsquarepants wrote: » I think with any of these large scale riots, it's a 3 thirds mix of people feeling generally aggrieved and venting their spleen, general scumbags and opportunist criminal types taking the chance to do a bit of looting, all whipped up and spurred on by your forever victimised activist types, who lets face it would demand action if the powers that be went door to door handing out kittens and chocolate. Nobody hears of someone being raped and thinks, you know what I'm so angry I'm going to rob a telly and burn a corner shop.
Flint Fredstone wrote: » Should we expect large scale rioting here if nothing comes of the McCabe tribunal?
Yourself isit wrote: » Was the policeman arrested yet?
moneymad wrote: » We don't have the backbone.