Turtyturd wrote: » I'd have thought most John-Pauls in Ireland would be the type to 'bate the head a ya' over a piece of aluminium.
Setanter wrote: » Pocahontas Walshe
Colser wrote: » Seriously?
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » John-Paul = conceived in 78/79 No doubt by people who voted for the 8th amendment in 1983 and against divorce in 1986. You know the type.
The Talking Bread wrote: » how do you mean? Do you mean spelling their birth name differently later on in life or altering the spelling of an existing name and christening your child said "new version" Your name is your name? 99% of names derive from another spelling origin. I mean, give us an example of said muppetry Most names evolve over time, spelling wise over time. Do we stop the trend now?
jd007 wrote: » bort
The Talking Bread wrote: » No such name.
Christian Salty Rug wrote: » This post has been deleted.
gerrybbadd wrote: » Juno:rolleyes:
Omackeral wrote: » The Talking Bread wrote: » how do you mean? Do you mean spelling their birth name differently later on in life or altering the spelling of an existing name and christening your child said "new version" Your name is your name? 99% of names derive from another spelling origin. I mean, give us an example of said muppetry Most names evolve over time, spelling wise over time. Do we stop the trend now? Take your pic from any of these sh*t 'K' names; Kaytlynn, Khloe, Kody.
The Talking Bread wrote: » Really?? The first 2 are lovely names, not sure the issue with 3rd either.. ??Jesus some people really are easily aggravated! ! Care to disclose your great name?!
Brinimartini wrote: » For some reason some people call their sons Colm but pronounce it Cullum......hate that.
irishgrover wrote: » well that's it. in the last 5 minutes, reading the last 10 pages I've read the names off all my 4 children :-(
Omackeral wrote: » You're in a thread specifically about **** names giving out about people talking about sh*t names. People substituting letters for the sake of it falls under that category. Chloe is a lovely name. Khloe instead of Chloe is just gimpy.
The Talking Bread wrote: » hmmmmmmmmmm , are a certain reality family (Kamily) having an influence on that dislike, I wonder!
The Talking Bread wrote: » Some people name their children after two people, ie both grandparents for example. Is Mary-Anne an obnoxious name? John-Paul?
The Talking Bread wrote: » Seriously, something like John-Paul, you think its obnoxious to use the full "two syllable" version! Come on! Most John-Pauls in Ireland were named after the pope! I know the Catholic Church is an obnoxious Institution but that name couldn't be any less obnoxious! At the end of the day, it is their name and they spent their life calling them such! They are hardly going to have a shorter version on the tip of their tongue for public occasions! You don't stop and think of your sons name before you utter it, it naturally is on the tip of your tongue! I understand ridiculous names but a simple combination of two names when christening your child, many of which have evolved into distinct names themselves over time: Sarah-Jane, Lizanne, etc is hardly breaking the obnoxious bank! At the end of the day, your name is your name! There are some f'ed embarrassing names out there, some child abuse offences! But I don't think a Sophia-Lily should be in that bracket! Jer name isn't Sophia, her name is Sophia-Lily! Sorry, don't want to rant but that is an example of faux outrage!
The Talking Bread wrote: » Really?? The first 2 are lovely names, not sure the issue with 3rd either.. ?? Jesus some people really are easily aggravated! ! Care to disclose your great name?!
The Talking Bread wrote: » YOU THINK "Chloe is a lovely name. Khloe instead of Chloe is just gimpy". Others may also agree but others will disagree. Tad different. Saying it as if it is a fact is silly. What is wrong with Kathlynn? Also Chloe originated from Cloe? So what would have been your thoughts with the alternation?
anna080 wrote: » Tupac Ward Epiphany Mc Donagh
The Talking Bread wrote: » What is wrong with Kathlynn?
Omackeral wrote: »