nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Gameweek 25 Matchday Thread. 3pm teams in op

Invincible

Tough call on captaincy this week, but think I'll stick with Sanchez, can't do any worse than last week, can he!?

Mod edit:
3pm teams:
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=102588979&postcount=164

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

CSF

Markx wrote: »

Surely be a chance for an Arsenal second as Hull push forward. Not fantastic from Sanchez today though. His decision making's been poor.

Hard to say whether Perez and Welbeck coming on helps or hinders him in this regard.

kopite386

Heaton normally my first choice keeper but I had to think who would score less goals Arsenal or Chelsea so I'm hoping this stays this way now

Markx

Surely be a chance for an Arsenal second as Hull push forward. Not fantastic from Sanchez today though. His decision making's been poor.

kopite386

Took a -4 to bring in Jesus, Firmino and Barkley for Kane, Lalana and Allen
Gone for all out attack and
Jackupovic (Heaton)
Coleman, Azplizecuta (McAuley, Martina, Aké)
Philips, Alli, Firmino, Erisken, Barkley
Costa, Jesus, Barnes

[Deleted User]

elefant wrote: »

Very clear dive.

clearly caught his foot. Even the commentators I am watching went as far as to say it was a second yellow for Rannochia (which I don't think it was but he definitely touched him)

elefant

[Deleted User] wrote: »

that wasnt a dive

f*ck you clattenburg

Very clear dive.

siblers

km79 wrote: »

Brunt and Pva not at wing back is disappointing

Balls, low returns incoming I imagine

CSF

Hard to justify keeping Sanchez based on this, ugh. Badly need a late flurry.

[Deleted User]

that wasnt a dive

f*ck you clattenburg

extra gravy

Holgate bench.

km79

Brunt and Pva not at wing back is disappointing

km79

Sanchez booked for diving

spock.

Sanchez booked for diving!

extra gravy

Evans on bench.

spock.

Antonio up front. Wish I owned him this week.

KevIRL

extra gravy wrote: »

Carroll not in West Ham squad.

That's a balls. Might be down to 10 this weeek

Ace2007

manual_man wrote: »

So annoying when poor officiating affects you in FPL. Goal should have been disallowed and now Arsenal should be down to 10. Could make a big difference between Sanchez captainers and non captainers. Not to mention non owners

fairly standard these days - pretty much everyone thought Valdes should have seen red last week, and would have been a peno - chance for spurs to fill their boots. Ref seeing it and didn't think it merited a pen yet alone yellow/red card. Joke.

extra gravy

Carroll not in West Ham squad.

CSF

This game is genuinely making me consider Sanchez out during his 2 game blank from 3 spell. Frustrating as can be. What is he doing back there?

clairewithani

km79 wrote: »

Arsenal have been very poor again
Hull final ball the only reason it's still one nil

Just going to post the same about Arsenal. Not looking like the old Arsenal at all.

km79

Walcott subbed
El neny on

km79

Arsenal have been very poor again
Hull final ball the only reason it's still one nil

spock.

Jaku save point

manual_man

Ace2007 wrote: »

So by the rules that surely is a red - last man standing professional foul

So annoying when poor officiating affects you in FPL. Goal should have been disallowed and now Arsenal should be down to 10. Could make a big difference between Sanchez captainers and non captainers. Not to mention non owners

spock.

Sanchez nowhere near the baps after 60 mins.

Cartman78

Clattenburg having a shocker according to the lads on SSN.

Such a relief that Captain Sanchez has got off the mark.....was a split decision with him , Siggy or Zlatan

km79

Clattenburg having his usual type of game

dahat

Markovic causing panic at times, thought he would improve given a chance at Hull.

Ace2007

So by the rules that surely is a red - last man standing professional foul

wonski

Fant11 wrote: »

Well it has to be intentional or arm in unnatural position. So u can score with your hand if neither of the above.

I think that rule has been changed and no goal if a ball touches the hand.