Tom05 wrote: » I think "charities" are some of biggest scams going. Over 80% of the money they bring in can go into "administration" before they even give out a penny to the people that need it. If someone from a "charity" asks me for money the first question I ask them is how much their CEO is being paid. When they tell me the salary of the CEO I say to them "you must be joking your asking me for money when your CEO gets 140k". A far better solution to having "charities" would be to give money directly to the people that need it. With the likes of gofundme etc.
Arcade_Tryer wrote: » There are homeless people (Well Roma Gypsy so they don't count as people obviously) in the town where I live and I often throw them a few cent too.
Omackeral wrote: »
baby and crumble wrote: » I may get piled on, but I work for a charity. I get a decent wage (I'm not CEO!), it pays the mortgage and the bills. I'm doing what I love, using my skills to effect change. We don't collect money from the public though. Never have and I sincerely doubt we ever will. I urge everyone who is thinking about donating to a charity to look them up, check them on the regulators website, look at the financial statements (they should have them on the CRA site and their own site, but if they aren't there ask for them), there are lots of good charities out there that are doing a lot with quite a little. 99% of the charities I know are so keen to prove their worth and demonstrate transparency. We hate what the scandals have done, that's not what we got into the sector to do. I could be making a lot more money if I had stayed in my original career path, or if I moved out of the sector, but I won't.
baby and crumble wrote: » We don't collect money from the public though. Never have and I sincerely doubt we ever will.
pilly wrote: » Also directly give money to anyone who asks me on the street because I reckon if they're desperate enough to beg then they need it.
sbsquarepants wrote: You've a lot to learn pilly.
sbsquarepants wrote: I think in the case of Dan Pallotta, what he says is true - you pay the big bucks to get someone who has the skills to make a real difference, there are people out there who would like to help and who have the skills and education to make a real difference, but at the end of the day why should they sacrifice their own families future to do so when they could be earning big bucks elsewhere. There is nothing inherently wrong with wanting to do well for yourself and your family.
Mr. FoggPatches wrote: » I threw a bucket of iced water over my head for Facebook.
thomasdylan wrote: » I hate those skydiving for charity volunteers though and the like. A largely selfish endeavour dressed up as charity.
lawred2 wrote: » Person A "I'm going to do a 200km walk in Peru for 3 months, It's for charidee - Admin fees are 8k but everything after that goes to charidee - seriouslee" Person B "Which charity?" Person A "Ummm - one of those children ones. I'll also be doing a bungee jump as part of it" Person B "............"
lawred2 wrote: » The bucket shakers at the checkouts drive me insane Around where we live it's usually something ridiculous like the local girls hockey team seeking funding for a trip to France or something.. Seriously just f**k off
pilly wrote: » I laughed at that. But tbf I think you have to pay your own costs.
Tom05 wrote: » I think "charities" are some of biggest scams going. Over 80% of the money they bring in can go into "administration" before they even give out a penny to the people that need it. [...]