Dirty Dingus McGee wrote: » Fair enough but you get a tattoo and it's there for life all other fashion choices are temporary. People do think about the future when they make decisions, that's a fiarly normal thing.
freshpopcorn wrote: » I think tattoos are horrible in general. I did have a small phase when I liked them but I know now for certain I don't like them that doesn't mean I've an issue with them on somebodies body tough. I just don't think they look nice. I'd have the same opinion about The Renault Megane 11.
NIMAN wrote: » My point is that 10 years ago, a man with a beard stood out from the crowd. Now there are so many beards around, despite the fact that if 4 years ago if you had asked a bearded hipster what he thought of them, he would have said never. But as soon as someone cool starts the trend, all belief goes out the window and the sheep must have them. I am not saying beards are ugly. Just that they dont separate you from the masses.
NIMAN wrote: » They are like beards, meant to make you hip and stand out from the crowd, but in the end it just makes you the same as everyone else.
73Cat wrote: » It never ceases to amaze me why some get so bothered by what others do. I have tattoos, I got them for me and no one else and I don't give a flying sh1te what others think of them. Likewise, I am not going to ask someone why they don't have tattoos, none of my business!
Dirty Dingus McGee wrote: » You do know that you can dislike something that someone does without being bothered by it.
73Cat wrote: » A lot of replies here would suggest otherwise !
Depp wrote: » this ''what about when you're 60'' notion is nonsense, any tattoo thats properly done by properly by an artist doesn't stop being art, you dont look at the mona lisa and say ''the colour has faded a bit so its not art anymore''. if its a well thought out tattoo that you got done properly and not something like ''malaga '16'' on your arse and you love it when you're 25, the likelihood is you'll still love it when you're 80. you don't like tattoos thats fine, theyre not for you. But when someone suggests that I've no sense of foresight or ability to plan for the future by asking have i not thought about what it'll look like when I'm older is massively ignorant. (for the record I don't have any sense of foresight but still...:D)
Depp wrote: » this ''what about when you're 60'' notion is nonsense, any tattoo thats properly done by properly by an artist doesn't stop being art, you dont look at the mona lisa and say ''the colour has faded a bit so its not art anymore''.
murphyebass wrote: » I think they look absolutely and utterly vile, manky, dirty, knackery, etc.. That said it really would be a boring world if we all thought the same so each to their own.
osarusan wrote: » I don't have any. When I was younger I seriously thought about getting one of a big skeleton with red glowing eyes across my chest. Obviously glad I didn't now.
Four Phucs Ache wrote: » Hopefully if I live to 80 odd I'm going to get a tattoo on my chest with a note to the mortuary staff when I die which goes : Do a better job on me today than one of your lot did to me grandad in 92.He looked like the joker played by Jack Nicholson.Google it and see what me granny saw. Thanks.
JustAThought wrote: » I was watching a thing on youtube on tattoos recently - a really beautiful english girl who was exploring the forbidden world of tattoing in Korea. She was a classic beauty and had perfect porcelaine skin . I kept trying to figure what it was about half her face - turned out she had had 'white' tatoos over it. Not body scarring or raising but a white tatoo. I winder if like other coloured tattoos that will fade into indigo over time like the red,yellow& blue ones do - or if ot will stay white? She had also had her eyeballs tattood; I jest you not. Google Russian prison eyeball tattoos if you want to revisit your dinner. ..................