b.gud wrote: » Thread about it here
Bridge93 wrote: » Mayweather wouldn't be particularly notorious (lol) for knocking his opponents out would he?
.ak wrote: » Yeah there's a good chance McGregor goes 12 rounds. Even if he loses 120-108 he'll come out of it smelling like roses if he goes the distance with who is arguably the best boxer of this generation.
Buer wrote: » Ah here. It looks like I'm deliberately trying to undermine you today, .ak but...ah here. McGregor would be punched around the place. Not a hope he's going 6 rounds let alone 12. Mayweather might not be a knock out puncher but he has stopped plenty of boxers. Only 6 of his first 25 pro bouts went the distance. He's a superb counter puncher and technical boxer. McGregor is an amateur boxer. It would be like an AIL scrum packing down against the 2003 England forwards.
.ak wrote: » He'll be fighting in 8oz mitts and he certainly won't be going on the offensive. McGregor has a chin and I don't see it being tested, Mayweather will rely on his counters all day and spend the 12 rounds defending. I don't see him knocking anyone out at this stage of his career, amateur or no.
irishbucsfan wrote: » Eh? Why on earth would Mayweather "spend 12 rounds defending"?
b.gud wrote: » Looking to take a, relatively cheap, midweek break this month. Anyone got any suggestions for a good place to start looking?
.ak wrote: » Because in his last few fights he's been almost exclusively a counter-puncher.
Stheno wrote: » Apparently Trump is planning an executive order which will crack down in someway on members of the LGBT community
mfceiling wrote: » Navan....
FACECUTTR wrote: » Amsterdam is fantastic even with the boss in tow.
stephen_n wrote: » Most of them have been unconstitutional so far, wonder will this one stay within the law. He's probably going after gay marriage in some way.
b.gud wrote: » We've actually been there a few times recently as she has a friend over there. It's probably only gonna be 1 night so will most likely stay in Ireland
AbusesToilets wrote: » You really have to wonder how far away we are from a major constitutional crisis. I could genuinely see a revolt in Congress against him, especially if this trend continues closer to the next round of elections in 2018.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I was speaking with someone earlier about this and they said that it's already at a point of a constitutional crises with judicial orders being ignored at the instruction of the White House. After a week things have completely spiralled out of control and the appointment of Bannon to the NSC is genuinely concerning. All the other stuff up to now has been highly embarrassing for America and worrying in the sense that it has plenty of popular support, but Steve Bannon is legitimately an extremely worrying and dangerous figure and it seems he holds incredibly power now. I think the best case scenario is that Pence will be president by the end of the year. If there is any terrorist attacks in the USA while Trump / Bannon are in situ we could be in real trouble.
AbusesToilets wrote: » Talk about going from the pot to the frying pan..