Richard Hillman wrote: » He made 4 Big Promises on his Election Campaign 1. He's gonna build that wall - CHECK 2. He's gonna introduce extreme vetting from Muslim countries - CHECK 3. He is going to be the Greatest job creator that God has ever produced - Work in Progress 4. He's gonna blow **** outta ISIS - ISIS will be done in 4 years time, no matter what he does. Penicilled-in CHECK Now let's start focusing on Ivanka 2024
C. Montgomery Gurns wrote: » Trump has restricted immigration from countries which have produced lone wolf attackers (Somalia, Afghanistan and Syria) in three countries in 2015 and 2016 (Germany, the USA and the UK).
pumpkin4life wrote: » 2017: The year of the leftist mental health meltdown epidemic. Trump has exceeded all triggering expectations. Eight executive orders within a week you say? Strap yourself in lads. Crazy SJWs being crazy you say? You ain't seen nothing yet. It's days like this I wish I was back in university. All the fun I could have.
TheRa wrote: » It's only a matter of time before Europe enacts similar policies. I give it one more "spectacular" in a major European city and that will be that. Or Wilders and Le Pen winning this year.
degsie wrote: » With Trump's executive order on Muslim immigration, his siding up with Russia and his spat with Mexico, alongside the UK turning its back on Europe, we are heading towards a darker place. The world seems a little less safe right now.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » All these stats are funny We can all think of many americans killed by ISIS inspired terrorists in USA in last few year.
end of the road wrote: » he has also restricted immigration from countries which haven't produced any lone wolf attackers, and let other countries which have out. no saudi on that list dispite them being the biggest funder of islamic terrorism. it's funny how the countries he has implemented restricted immigration from are countries he has no personal business dealings in, and countries which could fit the list for his restrictions (restrictions that are pointless by the way) are ones he has personal business dealings in.well, when one uses terms like "sjw" (which don't actually exist) i would suggest it isn't university they should be going back to, but cresh.
red ears wrote: » We can't keep going as we have been over the last 2 or 3 yards with the numbers of people coming in to Europe. Trump has already said he sees what is happening in Europe and he thinks its madness. There is talk of him making a deal with Saudi to help create safe zones in the middle east for refugees. Hope he does.
“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results”.
end of the road wrote: » Well, when one uses terms like "sjw" (which don't actually exist) i would suggest it isn't university they should be going back to, but cresh.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » Honest question: What word do you like to use when describing the no-platforming, safe space demanding, internet policing, politically correct re-write demanding cultural fascists who have been making so much noise in recent years? I agree that the term SJW doesn't convey the truth (social justice warrior sounds like a positive thing), I prefer cultural fascists or just cultural authoritarians, but if you have a different phrase in mind I'd be happy to consider using it from now on.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » What you can't do is deny that such a movement exists and calls itself "liberal". As a lefty and a liberal myself, you know I'm not a right wingnut just attacking the left in general - this is a cancerous movement on our own side of the political aisle which seeks to place sensibilities above freedoms.
end of the road wrote: » i just call them dip****s or busy bodies depending. works fine and is accurate.i have never denied the movement exists. however as i don't agree with them i simply ignore them and get on with my life. they won't convince me of their way of thinking so i ignore their nonsense.
darkpagandeath wrote: » It's hard to when you meet them for example. My partner was surrounded by these lot yes campaigning. They became very aggressive when she would not tell them what way she was voting. They seemed to virtue signal off each other and ramp up the language to out do each other. She came home crying. The worst thing was it was a group of 5 women attacking another woman. Just to add she was firm yes supported before that.
Jimmy Garlic wrote: » Marine Le Pen is surging ahead according to polls in France. That will be interesting. There could be a hat-trick on the cards.
sid waddell wrote: » Sure that happened. Still using your tired old nonsense cliches as well, I see.
sid waddell wrote: » Or, to put it another way, she's currently absolutely miles behind where she needs to be to win.
Obama: Donald Trump won't be president
darkpagandeath wrote: » Said that about, Trump. Problem with denouncing something before the final. I'm sure we will be seeing loads of SJW crying vids again in the near future.
sid waddell wrote: » "SJW" You just keep proving my point, don't you? You're like some sort of robo-conservative. Almost like you came from a factory.
Jimmy Garlic wrote: » She isn't, shes leading the polls, her chances are looking good. Sorry to disappoint you. It will be an interesting year again this year.
end of the road wrote: » i just call them dip****s or busy bodies depending. works fine and is accurate. i have never denied the movement exists. however as i don't agree with them i simply ignore them and get on with my life. they won't convince me of their way of thinking so i ignore their nonsense.
ChikiChiki wrote: » As we have seen with Trump and Brexit, I'd take the polls with a pinch of salt. Saying that, Marine Le Pen will be the next president of France. I have no doubt. That will be more certain if there is another terrorist attack on French soil. Then the EU will collapse in my opinion as Germany won't want to be propping up the smaller nations. Not something I want to happen but wreckless policy has led us to where we are today. Hold tight folks.
darkpagandeath wrote: » Remember Brexit too. :pac: No we will have the no Brexit lads who mocked and are still mocking everyone probably supporting Cal leaving the USA. Cant make this stuff up.
sid waddell wrote: » You clearly don't understand how the French Presidential system works, mate. And I note your lack of figures - Le Pen is down 2 points in the latest poll. Le Pen needs to be at absolute minimum 45% in the first round - she's currently on 25% and since the start of October has not got higher than 27% in any poll.
darkpagandeath wrote: » 1 out of 10, Free water ror Ireland, Respecting the Greeks sticking it to Europe.. Ay am a robo-conservative.. Social welfare in Ireland is fine would actually put it up.
Jimmy Garlic wrote: » You would think they would be delighted at the prospect of France having a female president for the first time
sid waddell wrote: » And you swallow the alt-right (far right) dictionary whole.
