kcb wrote: » Jesus wept! There's always one! I don't have stats! I just think it's dangerous.
kcb wrote: » And with bad driving then a tractor causes danger.
Pablo Escobar wrote: » Tbf if you know the N40 at all, you know that getting opportunities to move to the overtaking lane are at a premium. Never mind when you're forced to slow to 50kph. That's when your suggestion to overtake becomes dangerous.
Tara Shrilling Muck wrote: You mean the vehicle that's legally right to be there? Until the rules change, they are not the ones at fault,
kub wrote: » Speaking of legally, what colour diesel is in their tanks I wonder? Is this why they use tractors? Is this why they do not use truck? So before you bring up the word legal I really would like to know the answer to that query
kub wrote: » Speaking of legally, what colour diesel is in their tanks I wonder?
kub wrote: » Is this why they use tractors? Is this why they do not use truck? So before you bring up the word legal I really would like to know the answer to that query
pa990 wrote: » Their diesel is green. Agri vehicles using green, are not to be used on the public road, except for when they have to use the public road when travelling between properties (fields and farm yard) If you have an issue, phone customs. They're the guys and gals that deal with it.
munstermagic11 wrote: » When I speak of legally, I'm on about their right to be on the road. I have no idea of what is in their tank. Who is "they"? As suggested, talk to customs if you have a query on the colour of the diesel used. Tractors are "deadly dangerous" and you're wondering about the colour of their diesel in 'their' tanks. You seem to have branched off into some conspiracy thoery.
snottybridge wrote: » There's a house close to me being renovated, built up area, each time they get a skip it's dropped off by a guy in a tractor, as said previously it must be cheaper to have it done by tractor than you're traditional truck, don't know how this fits in with tractors on the road are supposed to be travelling between farms/fields.
kub wrote: » Check your facts there please or perhaps read the posters names a little slower, i never mentioned that tractors were " deadly dangerous", therefore your post is ridiculous as i have not branched off into any conspiracy theory.
kub wrote: » But as we are on the subject of dangerous, how many deaths have there been on farms relating to tractors? So in that case i actually agree with KCB.....see the C, there is no C in KUB.
the beer revolu wrote: » Munster magic, what is road tax?
Tara Shrilling Muck wrote: Well, you actually are branching off on a conspiracy theory when you start asking what colour fuel is in their tank and where they are going. A kub and a kcb in the same thread agreeing with each other. Coincidence or conspiracy theory?
Tara Shrilling Muck wrote: You agree that tractors are deadly dangerous, as per kcb. The conspiracy grows! I have no idea how many deaths are related to tractors on farms. My guess is that the tractors are rarely at fault, and usually it's the human element. You'll have to go elsewhere for the stats.
kcb wrote: You'd think the Munster fan would be happy now that their bandwagon is back on track!
overmantle wrote: » Thanks again to all those who replied to my original question but this thread seems to be gone completely off topic now.
mik_da_man wrote: » Standard procedure when the south link ring is mentioned
overmantle wrote: » No bother. I understand. The south link is becoming more of an issue. Hopefully the new flyover beyond the tunnel will alleviate some of the issues in the coming years.
Pablo Escobar wrote: » There are no flyovers or tunnels on the South Link.
TheChizler wrote: » There are 2 flyovers actually...
Ludo wrote: » He is being pedantic...the 2 flyovers are on the South Ring. Sigh.
TheChizler wrote: » I know ;-). Pedantic and incorrect as there are the two Douglas road flyovers on the South Link!
Ludo wrote: » oh ffs :-)
