Toyotafanboi wrote: » Indeed. 6 weeks test is a bit light for my liking though.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/2002-peugeot-406-new-nct-02-2018/14426723 New tyres , over a years test New belt and original condition Cheap motor for a year
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/mercedes-s320/14414414 Real shame about such high tax on such nice cars.
Soarer wrote: » Are they suds or paint peeling by the boot?
colm_mcm wrote: » You can get a refund on the tax if you scrap it.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Cars with big engines use more fuel and pay more tax because of it, so I don't see why they should need high road tax on top of the low mpg .
raddo wrote: » https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/nov-2005-volvo-v50-1-8-se-nct-oct-17-full-leather/13714426 Any opinions on this lads? What are these engines like?
unkel wrote: » The Greens were either ignorant fools or fans of cancer.
alastair wrote: » Perhaps you shouldn't be trying to hype up the relationship between diesel particles and cancer? The scientific evidence is that the risks posed at the emission levels applicable in most people's cases are low
unkel wrote: » Seriously??? From the front page of the Sunday Times a few months ago: "Diesel is the No 1 source of toxic air pollutants. Diesel particulates are carcinogenic and highly damaging to human organs"
Just because something is in IARC’s top level category, it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s public health enemy number one – it’s more complex than that. As Professor Phillips explains, “IARC does ‘hazard identification’, not ‘risk assessment’. “That sounds quite technical, but what it means is that IARC isn’t in the business of telling us how potent something is in causing cancer – only whether it does so or not”, he says. To take an analogy, think of banana skins. They definitely can cause accidents – but in practice this doesn’t happen very often (unless you work in a banana factory). And the sort of harm you can come to from slipping on a banana skin isn’t generally as severe as, say, being in a car accident. But under a hazard identification system like IARC’s, ‘banana skins’ and ‘cars’ would come under the same category – they both definitely do cause accidents.
bear1 wrote: » That accord. I mean drive it till the nct is up and flog it for the same price. Free motoring.
emeldc wrote: » Sure I read in the paper this morning that making your roast potatoes too crispy on the outside can give you cancer. The same for well-done toast. FFS.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/22/government-warning-roast-potato-cancer-link-massive-overreaction/