Bass Reeves wrote: » Yes I suppose you are right a small truck or medium van and fill it to the gils and get the boat every Thursday morning to the UK or the Contenitant. Then sell at there wekend markets or door to door and home Sunday or Monday. You be looking forward to Thursday morning I am sure.nSorry I think I will keep the day job.
Icelandicseige wrote: » Sure why would ye go to the UK. Isn't there enough restaurants in your county and they few surrounding you to keep ye happy. Obviously not a simple as said but not as tough as your making out either. Look if one is happy in there day job that's all well and good. Some have the drive and aren't happy to work for someone else. Different strokes for different folks.
kowtow wrote: » The perfect 'second" job for a farmer is surely as a travelling salesman / delivery service. For his own produce.
cjmc wrote: » I would have thought any factory / warehouse / general operative job close to home and where you're not a boss/foreman would be grand to help the farm
Grueller wrote: » Imo that should be the other way around. The farm should be a few extra pound in the system with the job as the main income.
Bass Reeves wrote: » I am afraid it is a very limited option for a very small number of people. It is not about drive it is about what is possible. Drive is not the issue either it is simple economics. The market is too limited.
kowtow wrote: » +100 certainly as we have things set up today. It would be nice to think that we could re-balance a bit so that premium and local foods and the markets that go with them became a part of the business of more and more farmers rather than a hipster niche - indeed I'm sure we'd be a healthier farming economy for it - but saying it and making it happen are two different things altogether.
yosemitesam1 wrote: » Did you ever read the farming ladder? Based on a mans experience setting up from scratch in the 30's, as relevant now as back then. I think its where joe salatin got most of his ideas from.
badshot wrote: » premiership footballer
20silkcut wrote: » Only thing about teaching is it limits farm growth and makes it unlikely that the farm will ever become a full time operation. You will always hold off buying those few extra cattle or renting that extra land because you have to mind your main profession. It keeps it very much in the hobby category. It would be madness to pack in teaching to go farming. If your in a more Mickey Mouse off farm job you are more likely to grow and expand your farming enterprise. More likely to view the farm as your number one priority. More likely to increase time spent on the farm and reduce time spent working off farm as your finances improve.
tractorporn wrote: » As said before if you work at something you love you'll never work a day in your life, but people can't live on fresh air. I don't see too many other professions needing a second job to keep them afloat. Teachers, nurses, guards and luas drivers weren't shy about looking for pay rises why should the farmer be happy with his lot?
memorystick wrote: » Not true. What is the advantage of a full operation? My bullocks can put the grass in their own mouths all summer long.
Username John wrote: » But isn't the issue here that current returns from farming wouldn't allow full time operations for most people... So its a case of what works best to allow some part time farming to take place... To say it keeps it in the hobby category - well, you need to decide what job is your primary job. For most, thats the one that pays money, which wouldnt be the farming one... If done right, part-time farming can be a nice top-up, but thats it... After that, you can call it hobby, or secondary, or part-time or whatever... I really think you're looking at it the wrong way - if you want to farm, but your home farm doesnt stack up financially for full time - then go working for a farmer as a full time job, and part time farm at home.
Bass Reeves wrote: » In a drystock operation what amount of good land(not even middling or poor land) would you need for a full-time e operation. Little difference between contracting, dealing, cattle transport or agent and the hours a teacher puts in. It is very hard to make money off rented land even if you have payments for it. And if there is payments on the rented land the owner wants them on top of the rent The worst of it is somebody will give it to him. If you are paying 100-150/ acre for land unless you are squeezing some payments off it are you making another 100/ acre off it. Rented land swallows time as well a lot of it will be poorly fenced and internal fencing g will be non existent generally. Of course you will mind the day job but it gives you a platform to expand if you wish. If you decide to buy land younwill not have to worry about getting a lot of money after tax to pay for it. Your biggest issue will be drawing you profit down efficiently but that is possible as well. I am in my mid fifties and the land I own I bought, if an opportunity comes to buy again I will take that opportunity. The only time I intend to farm full-time is when I retire around sixty
20silkcut wrote: » Honestly I think if your home farm doesn't stack up financially on its own two feet what is the point? For the love of it ? Fair enough I understand that.
Username John wrote: » I think I said 'stack up financially full time' So are you saying what's the point in farming part time? I think a lot has to do with love of it....