gooner99 wrote: » How do you rate them Colm, do you know much about the 1.6?
Patww79 wrote: » This post has been deleted.
gooner99 wrote: » Is that both the mk1 and mk2 ceeds your talking about Johnboy?
gooner99 wrote: » Looking back through this thread. The mk1 and mk2 i30/ceed seem to be good value. Whats the 1.4 petrol like in them?
colm_mcm wrote: » Oh yeah, the ones I was looking at were in Charles Hursts. There's a few uk models on Irish plates for sale privately too.
colm_mcm wrote: » Tax is €280 on the 1.6 valvemattic (current shape)
gooner99 wrote: » Wouldn't the post 08 1.6l be based on co2?
JohnBoy26 wrote: » Well the tax on the 1.4 vvti is €570 on cars registered on the co2 tax system so the 1.6 would be the same or more. The newer 1.33 dual vvti is a better engine than both and is €270-€280 to tax
gooner99 wrote: » I believe the 1.6 petrol is a nice engine too, reliable and economical? They just ring alarms bells here with 1.6 engines historically being sore on juice and high on tax. What is the tax of the 1.6l petrol here?
colm_mcm wrote: » Hybrid gets it too, surprisingly.
JohnBoy26 wrote: » The 1.2t has fully independent rear suspension and a better interior, not that it would matter to the majority of buyers in this country.
bazz26 wrote: » The current shape came out in late 2012. The same engines were carried over. They introduced a 1.2 litre petrol turbo with around 120bhp in 2015 along side the 1.33 litre engine but it costs about 2.5k more than the 1.33 litre so not too many takers of it here. 1.33 litre is less complex.
gooner99 wrote: » Also looking at a mk1 auris 1.33 dual vvti. From all accounts a very nice engine and a reliable car. I prefer the look of the pre facelift (09) model. Is there anything that would sway you towards the facelifted model?