lawlolawl wrote: » Steep, i presume. A 7/10 multiformat games that will run better on every other platform.
Atari Jaguar wrote: » A 7/10? So a decent game.
Digital Solitude wrote: » But not on the bus to work 7/10 is the standard for a pretty bad AAA
Atari Jaguar wrote: » 50 studios is very little support? Are you joking?
VinLieger wrote: » Expandable storage....... also its not like the other consoles nintendo don't ask you to install games even if you have the disc so theres not need for TB's
super_furry wrote: » Not really liking the look of Arms. Has the look of a Wii waggle-era game.
Lord Spence wrote: » I bought the wii u at launch felt the initial promise of 3rd support fell by the wayside very quickly indeed. What 3rd party titles are there for Launch? Sorry expandable storage in portable mode is fine but docked it really should have a decent sized hard drive, I am at a stage where nearly all my purchases are digital and in a world of game sharing I just think Nintendo are far far to late to the game. The sooner Nintendo become a software only company the better because there is no denying the quality of their 1st party titles.
super_furry wrote: » Definitely doesn't look like a full-price €69.99 game, which it is.
sligeach wrote: » There's a lot of daft prices. Skyrim will be €70 when isn't it half price elsewhere? The accessories are crazy expensive but worst of all is the Switch itself. Can't see it succeeding at €330. Coupled with many other problems. I'm possibly thinking now of just buying Zelda on Wii U and take a wait and see approach. Other than Zelda there's no other real standout launch game.
Deleted User wrote: » Zelda could have been a nice system seller if it was exclusive to the Switch.
Deleted User wrote: » Stream is lagging for me on twitch and YouTube.
super_furry wrote: » Well I don't know about you guys, but the quality of this stream is filling me with confidence about the fact that Nintendo will be charging of online from now on.