thomond2006 wrote: » Aaron Rodgers is phenomenal.
Buer wrote: » Good to see as there were whispers that he had lost it. He had gone through a sub-par couple of seasons but the last month has seen him as good as anything he has delivered in the past. Unfortunately for him, he's going to Dallas next and that's going to be a big ask especially for the Packers defence who were very flattered by last night's scoreline.
thomond2006 wrote: » Just starting playing Final Fantasy XV. It doesn't feel like a Final Fantasy game at all. I'm not a fan of the open world combat, it reminds me of FF 12 from the PS2 which I wasn't a big fan of.
Buer wrote: » Falcons should have too much offensively for the Seahawks. Just too many options and the Seahawks are too hit and miss. Steelers and Chiefs is going to be a massive game. If Roethlisberger can get a little time on the ball, I fancy the Steelers to snatch it. Bell is the best offensive player in the NFL over the past month. Unbelievable runner. Cowboys to win after a bit of a scare. The Packers secondary is awful and they're going to have to commit men to the line to deal with the Cowboys offensive line and Elliott. Packers can only win if Prescott falls apart.
swiwi_ wrote: » Basketball is where it's at. Or more precisely documentaries on American basketball.
_Tyrrell_ wrote: » Packers caught a lucky break against the Giants with the Giants receivers dropping two certain TDs and a couple of other big yard plays, I think it would've swung the game the other way completely. I can see Prescott and Elliot running riot against the Packers if they're on form. It all depends on how well their offensive line performs, as well as their defence, if they give Rodgers the time in the pocket he had against the Giants he'll be on form.
Buer wrote: » Agreed. Manning was let down badly by his receiving corps on the day. I don't know if the trip to Miami impacted on them but they certainly had their eye off the ball literally. They took to the field for their warm up shirtless in what I can only imagine was a show of machismo rubbish given it was -10C on the field.
Podge_irl wrote: » Worth acknowledging that Beckham was a huge part of the reason they were even there in the first place but it has been a long time since I have seen that many TDs butchered by such poor missed catches. Giants could have been 14-0 up pretty easily with GB struggling to move the ball at all. Ending up going in at the half down 14-6 must have been such a sickening blow.
sullivlo wrote: » Anyone else now thinking that awec and trump would get along after trumps recently leaked ( :pac: ) antics?
Zzippy wrote: » what has Trump done this time? I've given up clicking on stories about him, think I was risking rolling my eyes right back into my brain...
sullivlo wrote: » Russia have evidence of him paying prostitutes to put on golden shower shows for him
Buer wrote: » I really want to read this story but I really can't put that into a search tab in work. Meh. I don't like my job anyway...
errlloyd wrote: » Just read it on my phone, it doesn't disappoint. This will amount to nothing, but just IMAGINE if the same story came out about Hillary.
Deleted User wrote: » It's the election cycle that just keeps giving. I'd be absolutely mortified and very ashamed if this was Ireland.
Buer wrote: » Big Swinging Micky D busted for paying foreign strippers to urinate where Mary McAleese slept. It does seem a bit concerning in those terms.
Remember folks, these are only allegations. There could be a vas deferens between this and the truth. #GoldenGate
Zzippy wrote: » LMAO, some comedy gold on Twitter: