FreudianSlippers wrote: » FrancieBrady wrote: » You can say FG's health policy is a bluff because it patently and demonstratively hasn't worked. Can you say that SF's hasn't worked? No, because it hasn't been implemented. You can have an opinion though. SF's health policy is to spend an additional €3.3bn on healthcare; if FG spent an additional €3.3bn on healthcare, they wouldn't (in theory) have the issues you describe. Only problem with SF's plan is where do they get an additional €3.3bn? They don't seem too sure themselves - other than "the rich"! FrancieBrady wrote: » Korrekt Ich hätte "richtig" gesagt. :shrug:
FrancieBrady wrote: » You can say FG's health policy is a bluff because it patently and demonstratively hasn't worked. Can you say that SF's hasn't worked? No, because it hasn't been implemented. You can have an opinion though.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Korrekt
A Little Pony wrote: » Sinn Fein are famous for money growing trees.
FrancieBrady wrote: » That, as they say, is your prerogative. You go right ahead and find a party that wasn't party to driving our economy into the toilet.
FreudianSlippers wrote: » So you're admitting the SF policy that is "so much better you guys" than FG's policy is a magic €3.3bn?
Pawwed Rig wrote: Were I forced to select a SF taoiseach then I would probably choose Pearse. At the same time I would enrole in German lessons.
FrancieBrady wrote: » 'in theory' being the important word there. There is only one of the two who have been actually caught 'bluffing'. We would have to wait for SF to run their policies to say definitively that they are 'bluffing'.
jimmycrackcorm wrote: » Actually you should learn Greek seeing as Pearse told us we should be following the example of Syriza.
Permabear wrote: » This post had been deleted.
A Little Pony wrote: » It would work!. Can't believe socialists control Greece. I say control loosely, we all know the EU have them bent over the table.