tomasrojo wrote: » Strictly speaking, most of the methane is emitted via belching.
Chuchote wrote: » Wouldn't play, Miklos.
Pigeon Reaper wrote: » I've reported incidents and they're gotten back to me with positive results. It might take a while as they'll review CCTV.
P_1 wrote: » http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/teenage-boy-in-bicycle-theft-gang-bundled-into-van-and-has-leg-broken-by-vigilantes-35352371.html In two minds over this. Morally it is wrong to do this to anybody but given the lack of power the Gardaí would have due to the courts I guess it could be seen as a deterrent.
Chuchote wrote: » I fecking hate bike theft, but I would rather lose my precious bike to a thief than see the thief have his leg broken.
magicbastarder wrote: » or else, take out 'a deterrent' and put in 'simple thuggery'. possibly a turf war between rival gangs?
Meanwhile in Russia, hundreds of hardy cyclists braved temperatures as low as -27C in Moscow to complete a mass bike ride through the snow-bound Russian capital. Participants - some dressed in outfits of Santa Claus and his Russian equivalent Ded Moroz - pedalled along the bank of the frozen Moscow river in front of the Kremlin walls. The Moscow authorities said over 500 people took part in the 15km event - designed to promote cycling in the sprawling city - after organisers refused to call it off despite a danger warning over the freezing temperatures.
Chuchote wrote: » ... and sure, there's no way of knowing if it's stolen, you just have to cross your fingers....
Wishbone Ash wrote: » Many sellers of stolen bikes do not know the difference between low and high end compenents.
CramCycle wrote: » Really? I found them very dismissive bar the automated e-mail, it was hard to get a response at all. The CCTV went missing, they had no interest in the footage I had. Overall, not a helpful bunch. Although I admit that is not all DB staff, but there is a certain feeling of circling the wagons from some of them when a complaint is made.
penguin88 wrote: » I found the same. Reported two issues, one a fairly minor case in terms of danger but more of a rude driver, the second I genuinely felt unsafe, driver swerving into cycle lane at speed on top of me. Both just received the same auto response type email, a lot of which wasn't even relevant to the more serious incident. Contacted them again to follow up and genuinely very little reassurance offered that anyone was being done. If I'm unlucky enough to have a dangerous encounter with a DB again, I'll be going to the Gardaí in the first instance.
penguin88 wrote: » If I'm unlucky enough to have a dangerous encounter with a DB again, I'll be going to the Gardaí in the first instance.
Chuchote wrote: » It seems to be one instance where video footage is genuinely helpful. If they have evidence before their eyes of a carve-up close pass, they'll take action.
CramCycle wrote: » DB did not give a sh1t, they had the footage, and then mysteriously, it disappeared a short time later, presumably after it had been reviewed.
the driver also admitted it, on camera. He actually said he swung in on me, on purpose, to show me how dangerous cycling was. He warned me I was on camera
Chuchote wrote: » It is a trap to assume that all of an organisation are a single mind and a single thought and act at one, Cramster. You came across an individual who for whatever reason wanted to protect that particular driver - or perhaps, out of a misplaced sense of loyalty, his organisation. Not everyone in an organisation is the same, thinks the same or acts the same.
rubadub wrote: » The light sequencing at cabinteely village has changed. Wonder what further madness they are going to introduce at the new bus stop, maybe a few more manhole covers for good luck. I hope to christ the bus shelter is not one with a split in it where people can wander out the back.