AndrewJRenko wrote: » Doable, and with the added bonus that it generally encourages dangerous overtaking. Passing two cyclists side by side is generally easier that two in single file, as it is a shorter obstruction to pass. Do you do the same in busy traffic when you see a cycling coming up behind? Do you move over to let the faster cyclist through?
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Except that 'possible speeds' are of no relevance in busy traffic. But it is interesting to see that you avoid the answer.
Carpentry wrote: » never mentioned busy traffic. possible speeds going up the hill for example. compare them two.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » I asked you a general question, covering your entire driving experience. What proportion of your time do you spend stuck behind cyclists vs the time you spend stuck behind motorists?
Carpentry wrote: » I dont feel stuck behind other motorists as they tend to drive with same pace, where the cycling pair force me to slow down/almost to halt.
biko wrote: » At the weekend a couple in a shiny new D-reg Land Rover overtaking all the normal traffic by driving along in the bus lane like the royalty they fecking thought they were...
AndrewJRenko wrote: » You have noticed that the pace of other motorists in traffic is generally way slower than any cyclist, right?
NiallBoo wrote: » Well...that is the speed limit on most of our roads.
Carpentry wrote: » Not really. I mostly drive outside city centre.
Wanderer2010 wrote: » Anyone over 65 who still drives should be subject to a full medical every 2 years and a refreshing of the rules of the road, the amount of older drivers who still think its 1955 when there were only 5 other cars on the road- they indicate 1000m before the junction, they spend an age turning into streets and they are very unpredictable.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » But you do spend a fair bit of time on the M50, or as you called it, the 'free public car park', right?http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=101846771&postcount=18 Strange how you seem to have forgotten about all your time stuck on the car park.
ScumLord wrote: » Not on main roads with a hard shoulder and a sign that says 100kph. I was following a car and van last night and we were doing 100kph, then the van pulled off and the car in front of me slowed down to 80, like they were afraid to be the lead car.
Wanderer2010 wrote: » Anyone over 65 who still drives should be subject to a full medical every 2 years and a refreshing of the rules of the road, the amount of older drivers who still think its 1955 when there were only 5 other cars on the road- they indicate 1000m before the junction, they spend an age turning into streets and they are very unpredictable. .
kbannon wrote: » Maybe it was out of hours and you were one of those looking begrudgingly at the driver in the bus lane not realising they weren't actually breaking any law?
Carpentry wrote: » AndrewJRenko wrote: » But you do spend a fair bit of time on the M50, or as you called it, the 'free public car park', right?http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=101846771&postcount=18 Strange how you seem to have forgotten about all your time stuck on the car park. Fcuk me man, you really are p..in the a... As is said in the quote you stated, I do spend only THIRD of my driving on m50, which is like 33,33333333....% of all my driving. Did I mention anywhere where I drive the rest of it ???
Manic Moran wrote: » After spending the Christmas period at home, I again lament the lack of an ability to turn left after stopping for a red light. I am now back in the land of civilised driving rules, in the US.
chewed wrote: » I totally agree with you. This rule is great at keeping the traffic moving....but can you imagine the chaos and confusion if we introduced it here in Ireland? :eek: