getzls wrote: » Dogs are stupid. If I die in my home a dog will sit there and die of starvation. My Cat on the other hand is smart and will eat me.
Jimmy Garlic wrote: » Is anyone still taking these eco-freaks seriously?
Hulk Hands wrote: » How environmentally damaging is a Human?
Sam Kade wrote: » The op, digging up some nonsense rag like the Seattle times. Maybe Arnie wrote it to justify his hummer's.
getzls wrote: » Dogs are stupid. If I die in my home a dog will sit there and die of starvation.
kneemos wrote: » More so,but you can't eat Humans.
Miss Demeanour wrote: » The liver you can with a nice Chianti apparently.
Pat Mustard wrote: » Any old excuse to pull a cork boi...
Tigger wrote: » I have three dogs, honestly if it came down to it we'd be eating you op (well same as all the stuff we kill I'd eat the good bits like your bum and legs and I'd slow cook your shoulders and arms, but the dogs would get your heart and lungs and liver and kidneys and all the gristley bits. The cats would get your brain and other pryon bits and then we'd boil your bones for stock)
magentis wrote: » I'm eating my beagle Kate.
Cupcake_Crisis wrote: » You gave that an alarming amount of thought...
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » Dogs can survive on a vegetarian diet. Cat's can't. So in theory dogs could have a very low impact. But we live in Ireland where cattle are grass fed , so our meat and dairy products have low carbon impact. If you want empty calories then cereal has the lowest carbon footprint, but you need protein and other stuff and it turns out that veg may be worse at carbon simply because you need to so much more of the stuff to provide it. Also cat's tend to be smaller than dogs. A wolfhound feed on steak will bleed you wallet dry.