Pete Moss wrote: » Yep. Plus they threw Disturbed in there with Zeppelin as well :rolleyes:
Agricola wrote: » The thing I find sad about the change in the landscape over the last 20 years is no one singer or band will ever enter the national zeitgeist like say the Britpop bands of the 90's. There is a lot to be said for collective experiences. We had musical movements which people latched onto. Now, we basically have highly manufacturer products being delivered by celebrities, and it's more celebrity / fame worship that fans are engaged in, more than a case of the music speaking to them on a personal level. Or so it seems anyway. People always say, "seek out the good music it's there if you look for it" - that's fine and dandy. But the point is, isn't it sad that where once the charts were stuffed with real artists like Bowie who managed to reach a mainstream audience, they are now being lost and denied that huge mainstream audience because people like Nikki Minaj are cluttering up the radio airplay.
GreenFolder2 wrote: » I find younger folks listening to what are classic 1990s underground / electronica stuff as if it's a new discovery. Recent years have produced a lot of low brow, churned out commercial dross. It's hard to find the gems in the sea of reality tv style garbage. You also went from an era that was more into live music and underground dance stuff into an era that has been horrifically superficial - all about tacky music and dressing in fake tan. The upcoming Trump and Brexit driven angst will produce some good music again. It's the upside to political instability, threats of global calamity and economic depression.
Austria! wrote: » There's a fantastic appreciation of subtle dynamic changes, a wonderful incorporation of rappish elements
Elemonator wrote: » While there is a higher percentage of **** music being made today, just remember that **** music has always been made including the stuff in the 1980's but we have just forgotten about it. This only leaves the good stuff!
Zaph wrote: » This, more than anything else, is what p*sses me off so much about modern pop music. Why does every bloody song have to incorporate a rap section? It's generally pointless, incongruous and adds nothing at all to the song. But because everyone else is doing it artists seem to think that they have to do it as well.
Zaph wrote: » The problem now is that the good music being made these days isn't getting the same exposure as good music in the 80s did, so in 20 or 30 years time there'll be no-one going on about how good the music from 2016 was because all the popular stuff that's getting the exposure is so instantly forgettable.
Suas11 wrote: » It's not that hard to find good music. Just a bit of digging on the internet and you'll find loads of great stuff. I don't think the whole Brexit/Trump thing will make any difference to mainstream music. People said the same about the economic collapse and nothing happened.
Atari Jaguar wrote: » Not to go all "BACK IN MY DAAAAY!" but whenever I hear some of what's popular today I get a little sad. ........ fake voices and synth instruments
ScumLord wrote: » Music is at a very different stage now than it would have been even 20 years ago. It's much more accessible, it's much more developed and understood, we've applied science to it so major labels know what noises tickle our primitive brain in just the right way and there's a lot more of it. There's too much of it for any of it to be special anymore. The labels are producing engineered products, rather than latching onto whatever the kids are up to. That all seeps out into every other part of the music industry. The people growing up learning music want to get fans and to do that they follow the same formulas as the big boys (because technology has made that possible) and end up formatting themselves for the music industry. Part of the problem is we're also coming off a time when music was instrumental in social changes, the 50s to the 80s was a unique time that allowed for an explosion in music, but I don't think that can go on, it was a moment, but now it's over. Now music has become a product and it's even losing it's ties to culture and becoming more associated with lifestyle. Music was better in the recent past because it meant something, it did something. Now it means nothing outside of personal appreciation and its been usurped by other vehicles when it comes to social change.
mzungu wrote: » Looks like somebody started the New Year celebrations a bit early
Pawwed Rig wrote: » MTV used to drive the music industry whereas now there is noone.
GreenFolder2 wrote: » I find younger folks listening to what are classic 1990s underground / electronica stuff as if it's a new discovery.
Irish Guitarist wrote: » It's easier for producers to churn out nonsense because of modern technology. In the eighties Stock, Aitken and Waterman drowned everyones voices in a weird, warbly, phased effect to hide their flaws. Now producers can just use Autotune. There's even a live version of Autotune that singers can use in concert. Milli Vanilli will probably never happen again because rather than getting someone to lip sync to someone elses voice, you can use their real voice but cover up the bum notes with Autotune.
GreenFolder2 wrote: » The upcoming Trump and Brexit driven angst will produce some good music again. It's the upside to political instability, threats of global calamity and economic depression.
lulu1 wrote: » I think everyone is going to love the music they grew up with. If you gave me 1000euro I couldn't name a song in the charts today. Sometimes when an oldie comes on the tv or radio I call the kids (teens)just to see their rolling eye reaction
Tipperary animal lover wrote: » Today's music is sh*te, grew up in early 90s*)(had to go up to sister in dublin for proper night out) jaysus lads had some club nights mansion house was rocking,!!! Henry's in cork was even better.... christ they were proper nights, now tis fair sh*te to go out and listen to the party heads now .....