InTheTrees wrote: » Honestly it sounds like a contrived invented reason so the Nazis can feel enraged about Jews. Nazis try and establish a base in a quiet tourist town and oh shock horror the evil Jews are now targeting the Nazis mother? Is here any actual evidence of this?
Billy86 wrote: » "These people". Go on. Use the word. You know you want to.
Amazingfun wrote: » Deflection yet again. The facts remain, despite your refusal to accept them.
20Cent wrote: » The mistake when discussing the alt right is assuming they are rational or open to logic or facts. They have no interest in that just in winding up others.
Amazingfun wrote: » Are you for real? What a ridiculous post. I have shared this before, btw. Try researching the incidents you feel compelled to comment on:
Billy86 wrote: » The facts do remain, I've spelled them out and you haven't rejected them. Here's another fact - the guy is banned from all 26 Schengen countries due to trying to organise White Supremacist activities. He is what he is, a White Supremacist, it's that simple. But feel free to keep digging if you must.
Amazingfun wrote: » You must not understand rejection then, since I have replied to your drivel numerous times. Also: I don't know what tossing in the "some guy" line is meant to do, as its irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Bizarre move there, lol.
Amazingfun wrote: » Pretty funny comment given I have just provided facts that show comments from "IntheTrees" (among others) are based on absolute ignorance :rolleyes: Sherry Spencer is a victim of a vicious extortion and is an innocent. Unless you approve of extortion as a means of attacking those whose ideas you don't like, you ought to be on her side as well.
Amazingfun wrote: » You are citing a 2014 event, when we were discussing Spencer's MOTHER being the target of extortion. You're all over the place.
You can call him what you want: he has explained why he rejects that label.
I have also already explained why I am glad that an innocent women being targeted by criminals with the intent to extort her has people willing to defend her. It's refreshing to see pushback against such rotten people
Amazingfun wrote: » Sherry Spencer is a victim of a vicious extortion and is an innocent.
Amazingfun wrote: » Extortion is a crime Billy. Even when done against people you place the "nazi" or "supremacist" label on. Btw: your labels mean nothing to me. I mean, why would they?
Billy86 wrote: » If it's extortion, the police will step in like they did with Spencer in Hungary. Hey, why was he arrested in Hungary, then deported and banned from all 26 Schengen countries again?
In 2014, Spencer was deported from Budapest, Hungary, and via the Schengen Agreement, is banned from 26 countries in Europe for three years, after trying to organize National Policy Institute Conference, a conference for white nationalists.[4][33]
Amazingfun wrote: » Stay tuned and we'll see what comes of it all.
Amazingfun wrote: » :pac: You can't figure it out? Try his wiki page. He did a MONSTROUS thing: he organized an NPI meeting, omg, what an EVIL man!
Amazingfun wrote: » Stay tuned and we'll see what comes of it all. Apparently Tanya Gersh, the prime extortionist, has already been removed from her employers website, indicating a possible firing. It is the holidays, suppose January will be when we have more info.
Brian? wrote: » Logic does not dictate that at all. There are too many variables to draw a conclusion based on the electoral result alone. It's an over simplification to use the result as a measure of the candidate. My no objective measurement was Trump a better candidate. But then objective measures don't win elections.
Billy86 wrote: » Ah, funny you bring up Wikipedia - here's the first sentence of his Wikipedia entry: Richard Bertrand Spencer (born May 11, 1978) is an American white nationalist, known for promoting white supremacist views. And the first sentence of NPI's Wikipedia page: The National Policy Institute (NPI) is a white nationalist, white supremacist think tank based in Arlington, Virginia. So yep, he got banned from 26 Schengen countries for trying to set up white supremacist activities, exactly like I said. And that's because, as everyone is well aware, he is a white supremacist.
InTheTrees wrote: » Well spencer is realising his mistake and trying to distance himself from the nazi rally scheduled for mid January. No doubt his mother is horrified that her son has ruined her reputation in town. Meanwhile the residents of Whitefish are ALL (except presumably the spencers!) displaying Menorahs in their windows. Screwing with a town's livelihood by scaring away the tourists does not garner much sympathy with the locals.
20Cent wrote: » Why not let the cops deal with it without the march then?
Amazingfun wrote: » The same article also states he rejects that label, yawn.
Amazingfun wrote: » Don't see what the march has to do with the cops investigation tho, they can still investigate, march or not.
Amazingfun wrote: » The same article also states he rejects that label, yawn. Nope, he got banned for organizing an NPI conference, as it says. Oooooooo, such a threat. What a joke. Wish they were as diligent about banning say, refugees who mow down Christmas markets and the people in them, etc.
