SixSixSix wrote: » I doubt that the side effects are eliminated because of taking it as a suppository. I suspect it is the removal of the THC that does that!
R P McMurphy wrote: » You doubt it because you have no experience of it .
HellSquirrel wrote: » Toddler with seizures given medication. Medication has worked and child is no longer having seizures [...] So why is this news again?
K.Flyer wrote: » Primarily because the "medication" is a Cannabis extract which contains high levels of THC. Anything found to contain THC in Ireland is illegal, as is its possession or use. But because the family have shown it to be beneficial to managing their son's condition, the government have set a precedent and granted them a licence to legally use Cannabis as a medicinal product.
Esel wrote: » Low (very low) levels of THC, no?
K.Flyer wrote: » Any level of THC has always been deemed illegal, hence the interest in the subject.
Esel wrote: » You said high levels, hence my post.
R P McMurphy wrote: » Jaysus do I have to spell it out. You put the oil in a capsule. This allows people to consume oil without any of the side effects traditionally accociated with cannibas by taking it as a suppository
lertsnim wrote: » Can we cut the bollocks and now legalise this for everyone whose life would improve with it.
brembo26 wrote: » MODS:Can we have a poll? I literally have no interest in any form of cannabis but if, like i said it 'helps someone and its controlled' i'm all for it.
_Kaiser_ wrote: » Aaaaaand once again we have some people trying to use this story as a reason to legalise cannabis for recreational use. As others have said, this is a different product (cannabis oil) with a very different intent (stop the poor little fella having multiple seizures per day, rather than getting high) and in the context of that, I can't see why anyone would have a problem with it. But it's not the same as letting the "cool kids" get high. Not at all.
HellSquirrel wrote: » It's certainly a hell of a lot more important that it's legalised for medicinal use than recreational, but it does seem frankly nuts that a drug as objectively safe as cannabis is illegal for medicinal use when far more dangerous synthetic drugs are allowed. I'm by no means an "organic = safe" advocate; -arsenic- is organic. But it appears to work, other countries are legalising it and -even- if it was legalised recreationally, it is far safer than alcohol, which is itself only the second most common drug after caffeine. It is a very odd social prohibition that we've created against it. On the flipside, and this is purely from the recreational point of view, it can have effects on people with odd brain chemistry, increasing paranoia and other mental fixiations. It may not be a good idea to legalise something that can have that effect (at least until we know why and if there's a way to mitigate that) and then there's the issue of people abusing it more easily - smoking and driving for instance. We do have both those issues with alcohol already. But all that aside, as it is a rather different subject, it absolutely should be legalised for medicinal use.
HellSquirrel wrote: » On the flipside, and this is purely from the recreational point of view, it can have effects on people with odd brain chemistry, increasing paranoia and other mental fixiations. It may not be a good idea to legalise something that can have that effect (at least until we know why and if there's a way to mitigate that) and then there's the issue of people abusing it more easily - smoking and driving for instance. We do have both those issues with alcohol already.
pragmatic1 wrote: » I don't care for it personally as it gives me awful paranoia but I don't see a reason for it's prohibition.