LIGHTNING wrote: » ^ Whats up with the frame rate on your dashcams?
eringobragh wrote: » Always happens at this spot - I usually hover over the brake going around here! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrmojZwRM7c
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Still don't get it. You were behind black car, white car was in inner lane and ahead of you, and suddenly you decide while going around bend to veer heavily into inner lane, and you think car in that lane is wrong ?You're crazy
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » I don't get it, you were in one lane then moved in on top of the car in the inner land and blew horn at him. He never moved from his lane or path, you did big time /? Why did you not follow black car in front. Why would you suddenly veer in on top of that car on inner lane.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » I don't get it, you were in one lane then moved in on top of the car in the inner land and blew horn at him. He never moved from his lane or path, you did big time /? Why did you not follow black car in front. Why would you suddenly veer in on top of that car on inner lane. You need to learn to drive I think. That is pretty bad.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Still don't get it. You were behind black car, white car was in inner lane and ahead of you, and suddenly you decide while going around bend to veer heavily into inner lane, and you think car in that lane is wrong ? You're crazy
kuro2k wrote: » 2 x 1000hp turbocharged, supercharged diesel engines
Alanstrainor wrote: » This road changes from 2 lanes to 3. The OP continued in the lane they were in the entire time, there was no veering. The silver car veered into their lane. Hence the video. Silver car should have indicated and yielded to change lane.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » No way. What about black car in front. If OP follows it then there is not issue, why was he behind black car if it wanted to be in the lane silver car was in? And why would he not allow silver car to move ahead first before veering into him? Had it stayed behind black car there was no issue, he caused the issue. If he wanted to be in lane he veered into then he should have been in that lane behind silver car, not in outer lane following black car.
Vic_08 wrote: » https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3454266,-6.255031,55m/data=!3m1!1e3
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Ok You know that road and I have never seen it. But if it's an awkward spot then it does not give someone the right to veering into a car regardless. If a guy is sitting in middle of road it doesn't mean we run over him because we are right and we know road better. If it's a strange road where lanes combine then why act like everyone else should know the road like he does. All I see is a silver car on inside, and a guy following black car. He stops following black car and ends up way over in on top of car he knows is there.
Ionised wrote: » El-cheapo cam is whats up Seriously..it cost €22 so I'm constantly amazed it works at all. If anyone wants to sort me out a better one for christmas feel free!
JPF82 wrote: I got a cheapo one from Eurogiant that does the same. like yourself, amazed it works at all. Frame rate not a big concern at that price. It's just an extra bit of protection in the event of something untoward happening.
dfeo wrote: »
blade1 wrote: » Courier called earlier. Hands me a box. I tell him I am not expecting anything. I accept it anyway and courier heads off. I go inside open the box and there's a dual dash cam inside. Same as the one I purchased about a month ago. Note in with it saying " hope you enjoy your gift and would love to see you soon on Amazon.co.uk". The one I bought earlier was off e-bay.
Arcade_Tryer wrote: » Other car is in the wrong. And you're going too fast to expect the unexpected.
Mycroft H wrote: » That a MK2 Golf your driving Kuro?
Seve OB wrote: » Wow, cool. But was it the same seller even though different platforms? What good would it be to send you a second? Of course great to receive but a bit odd. Of course could be a different seller...... so how the hell did you swing that? Pretty nice gift.