andekwarhola wrote: » More power to them for doing their bit for the homeless but the thought of persistent, impromptu 'jams' invloving Damien Dempsey, Glen Hansard and Mundy turn the blood to ice. I'm just waiting - with no small amount of terror - for the news that In Tua Nua and Emotional Fish have spontaneously reformed and are on the way into Hawkins Street with acoustic guitars, beanie hats and hessian weave sleeping bags.
bitburger wrote: » There is a rather large difference between something being wrong to do and something being Illegal.
Bambi wrote: » Christy Moore is feverishly writing a christmas song as we speak "Free the Apollo 13"
the groutch wrote: » the only job it's done is wasting Garda resources that could be put to much better use elsewhere.
david75 wrote: » It's been sent for appeal January 4th I'm hearing. Job done.
VinLieger wrote: » Trespassing is illegal
bitburger wrote: » So is Blasphemy, Abortion and Euthanasia, does that automatically make all of these wrong then?
VinLieger wrote: » Your trying to equate laws for trespassing with the 8th amendment to justify people staying illegally in a building....... I think this arguments jumped the shark lads
Dr Crayfish wrote: » This is so tricky, the homeless issue. The way I see it, no matter what we do, in a capitalist society there will always be homeless people. What is the solution? If we all agreed to pay a little bit more tax so we could house them all, would that not encourage more people who are struggling somewhere, maybe living in a broken home, to just say f**k it I'm going to live on the streets, knowing that eventually they will get a place given to them? If there were comfortable quarters available to all who were in need, the places would fill up right away, and there'd still be people left on the outside. I'm not sure what we are supposed to do here.
would that not encourage more people who are struggling somewhere, maybe living in a broken home, to just say f**k it I'm going to live on the streets, knowing that eventually they will get a place given to them?
If there were comfortable quarters available to all who were in need, the places would fill up right away,
Deleted User wrote: » Listen to yourself! Isn't that what we should be doing? Ireland is a socialist state, allegedly. Good! Amazing! Not seeing our brothers and sisters suffer should be a main goal in life. You never know if it could happen to you.
Dr Crayfish wrote: » What I'm saying is that it may encourage more people who don't really need to be homeless, to become homeless. I really think that no matter how many shelters or beds we had, there'd still be people on the outside.
mr_edge_to_you wrote: » I saw one campaign recently run by the Luas crowd which said they collected 9000 shoe boxes for the homeless which had hats, scarves, gloves, soaps, jocks and socks in them.There definitely isn't 9000 people sleeping rough on the streets. So if the mininum value of each box was €20, €180k has been spent of stuff that in reality isn't needed. €180k in the hands of Peter McVerry Trust would be better use of money. In addition, the €100k already raised (as already mentioned on the thread) would be better spent in the hands of a reputable charity rather than on legal costs. The people leading this Apollo House stunt are doing so in an irresponsible manner. By putting people in this building they've created a situation whereby the trespassers will have to be removed from the building and put back on to the streets. To me the whole thing is a bad publicity stunt that has no long term benefits for anyone. In addition we have countless other charities doing the same work. They should really by pooling resources and consolidating funds with a view to doing more for those it wants to help. This stunt will only affect those who are sleeping on the streets, the sad reality is many of these people can't be helped. Since I first went to Dublin as a child I've been seeing people begging and sleeping on the streets. There's always going to be people on the streets. It's inevitable. Peoples efforts should be spent trying to help families that are stuck in hotels because there is no council housing. How is occupying Apollo House going to help them? What is it going to do to help people who are working and can't afford the deposit required to buy their own home? What's it going to do to help people move out of apartments that are not suitable for the family's needs? At the same time, the politicians who are supporting this project are saying that I should be paying more tax to make sure everyone has a home? Well I've got news for you. I havent got any more to give. I already pay 50% of my salary in tax to make sure my own family have a roof over their head. I pay for their medical expenses our of my own pocket. I spend over 3 hours a day commuting to be in a position to do all this. We have 3 crises at the moment: Homelessness Housing Rent 3 very different and complex issues. Apollo House has just created one more problem for all involved to have to clean up.
Boom_Bap wrote: » Court order for Apollo House to be vacated has been issued. Needs to be vacated by 11th Jan
scamalert wrote: » exactly homeless person isnt just for christmas,it happens all year long but people think one good deed for a day and then carry on,till next December. But to justify taking someone else property to host 200 people is wrong,since cleaning fixing it up afterwards will cost whoever owns it be it via insurance or tax payer.And because they take 200 of the street for 8 hours that streets would appear clean at night wont solve issue with people going back to same places for the whole next day all over again - thus fixing this way its not solving anything.
iLikeWaffles wrote: » The whole goal of Apollo House is to have no homeless on the streets at Christmas time.!
limnam wrote: » People seem to fixated on the cost of policing when there hasn't been any.
Phoebas wrote: » There will be legal costs of the High Court action, which presumably will fall to the organisers since the owners won the case.
Phoebas wrote: » I wonder what'll happen to all the brand new mattresses that Mattress Mick provided. Hopefully they'll find a new home for them, but I wouldn't be surprised if they all end up in a skip.
limnam wrote: » How does this effect "us"
limnam wrote: » Why don't you come up with a really good idea for a possible home for them? Why does everyone want to point out problems and offer no solutions? I'm sure the SVDP would be very happy with them.....
Phoebas wrote: » I never said it did. It seems to me that a lot of resources went into this stunt, that maybe could have been better directed. Maybe the SVdP take second hand mattresses; as I said, I hope they find a home for them. I just think it might be difficult for reasons outlined by Loveinapril there.
Phoebas wrote: » I never said it did. It seems to me that a lot of resources went into this stunt, that maybe could have been better directed.
limnam wrote: »