ohlordy wrote: » Sunday Business Post had it being scrapped on their front page yesterday. I would think that's a step up from it only being mentioned on clickbait sites as stated above
Cayden Red Sender wrote: » I'd imagine even if it was scrapped it would still stand from July to whenever the scrapped date would be, as it would screw a lot of parties otherwise.
ohlordy wrote: » Today the Irish Times are reporting details of how it will work, opens for applications on revenue website from January 3rd, so perhaps it is going ahead as planned
stickman22 wrote: » Great, so this current year (2016) is taken into account?
TheUnderfaker wrote: » That's the word I got from revenue, yes. Can we take their word is a completely different question 😉
CramCycle wrote: » It is never their word, it is their "opinion", and you should try and get it in writing (not in this matter but in general). Opinions like they say, are like ********s, everyone's got one. Just like real life though, revenue are entitled to change their opinion.
TheUnderfaker wrote: » I have submitted a query to "my enquiries" on revenue.ie and am waiting on a response to that. Just called up in the meantime to ask the question. I'd be inclined to believe the guy I was talking to. The online system works for the last 4 tax years so when it comes to submitting applications in 2017 the only years available will be 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. I will update here when I get the written response anyway.
CramCycle wrote: » Thanks for that. I do wonder then the hubbub about getting the 2012 (which had to be scanned and submitted online to a different are of myaccount) stuff in. Is it a case of, which ever one suits you best?
TheUnderfaker wrote: » I must have missed that hubbub... What happened there if you don't mind me asking?
CramCycle wrote: » hubbub might be a bit strong. Revenue are currently taking Form 12s on their website for the year 2012, specifically for the purpose of the help to buy scheme. i think someone here even had a link earlier. Instead of just rolling back the current system from 2013 to 2012, you had to print out the Form 12 for 2012, fill it out, scan it and submit it online (only for this scheme). They will then use this for those who bought in 2016 apparently. Hence why I ask will it be the best of the two options?
TheUnderfaker wrote: » Interesting, I never knew that was happening. Hopefully we get the best of both worlds or else I ain't gettin no rebate!
Collyb101 wrote: » I plan to get on Revenue [my account] pronto in January to organise my p21 forms for 2012-2016. Hopefully work from there.
Collyb101 wrote: » Yes, of course. No need for 2012. I actually had to get 2015 for my mortgage application and I was given an unexpected €1200 back. Nice wee surprise. I'll do the rest together as I cannot be arsed doing it twice. I haven't been keeping up to date with this thread/the details of how things will work BUT i have paid my 10% deposit on my house to be already to secure the contract. Does anyone know, at this point, how the reimbursement might work? Probably been discussed a dozen times, sorry.
cronos wrote: » On that topic. I signed a contract on August 2nd 2016, but house won't be finished + snagging till February 2017. So do I use 2013 - 2016 or august 2012 to august 2016?
Alter_Ego wrote: » You are free to choose any or all of the last 4 years for the tax return. For example, if you paid 20,000 tax in 2015 and looking for 18,000 refund, you just need to complete tax return for 2015.
CramCycle wrote: » I thought they had stated that you must be tax compliant for the four years (even if all your tax is coming from one year), hence you had to get 4 of the P12 forms as this was their standard, even though for most of us this is no different than the info on our P21s.